Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BALI vs VOO
iShares Advantage Large Cap Income ETF and Vanguard 500 Index Fund.
| BALI iShares Advantage Large Cap Income ETF | VOO Vanguard 500 Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Income desk | Core fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | covered call, vs SPY | S&P 500 |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.9% | +20.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +20.0% | +20.0% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.0 pts | +0.1 pts |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 8.6% | not an income fund |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.03% |
| Holdings | n/a | 506 |
BALI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, BALI paid 8.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 11.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.0 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 7.4%, paid monthly.
VOO in plain words
VOO is a index equity fund tracking S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.1% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 506 positions, with the top ten at 36.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BALI or VOO?
- In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BALI returned +20.9% and VOO returned +20.1%, so BALI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Are BALI and VOO the same kind of fund?
- No. BALI is an option-income ETF and VOO is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BALI against VOO, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BALI-VOO.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources