Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BAI vs QQQ

iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BAI and QQQ hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions BAI and QQQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingBAIQQQ
NVIDIA Corp5.43%8.16%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc3.84%3.70%
Alphabet Inc4.26%3.52%
Broadcom Inc5.97%3.37%
Micron Technology Inc3.21%4.80%
Intel Corp2.72%2.52%
Lam Research Corp3.99%1.75%
Tesla Inc1.68%3.46%
Meta Platforms Inc1.15%2.97%
Sandisk Corp/DE1.62%1.10%
Palantir Technologies Inc1.08%1.58%
Western Digital Corp2.30%0.79%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BAIOnly in QQQ
SK hynix Inc 4.93%Apple Inc. 7.29%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 4.64%Microsoft Corp. 5.32%
Tower Semiconductor Ltd 4.22%Amazon.com, Inc. 4.62%
Elite Material Co Ltd 3.20%Alphabet Inc. 3.26%
Fabrinet 3.13%Walmart Inc. 2.48%
Alchip Technologies Ltd 2.68%Cisco Systems, Inc. 2.09%
Advantest Corp 2.44%Costco Wholesale Corp. 1.86%
Delta Electronics Inc 2.39%Netflix, Inc. 1.59%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

BAI and QQQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BAI
iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust
Where it sitsThemes deskCore fund
IssueriSharesInvesco
What it isArtificial intelligenceNasdaq-100, book from QQQM
Total return, 1 year+43.1%+25.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+20.0%+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500+23.1 pts+5.6 pts
Expense rationot published0.18%
Already in the S&P 50050.0%96.7%
Holdings45101

BAI in plain words

By weight, 50% of BAI's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 78%. The top ten holdings are 44% of the fund across 45 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +43.1% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 23.1 pts. It sits 17.8% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

QQQ in plain words

QQQ is a index equity fund tracking Nasdaq-100, book from QQQM. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 4, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BAI or QQQ?
In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BAI returned +43.1% and QQQ returned +25.6%, so BAI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
How much do BAI and QQQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 50% of BAI and 97% of QQQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 30% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are BAI and QQQ the same kind of fund?
No. BAI is a thematic ETF and QQQ is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BAI against QQQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BAI against QQQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BAI-QQQ.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources