Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ARTY vs QQQ

iShares Future AI & Tech ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ARTY and QQQ hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ARTY and QQQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingARTYQQQ
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.5.39%4.80%
NVIDIA CORPORATION4.37%8.16%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.5.24%3.70%
BROADCOM INC.4.25%3.37%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION2.38%5.32%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC.2.18%1.58%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMIT2.80%0.84%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION2.92%0.79%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY, INC.4.54%0.78%
CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORPORATION.1.60%0.46%
WORKDAY, INC.0.82%0.14%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ARTYOnly in QQQ
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 4.84%Apple Inc. 7.29%
COREWEAVE, INC. 4.27%Amazon.com, Inc. 4.62%
SK hynix Inc. 3.63%Alphabet Inc. 3.52%
SUPER MICRO COMPUTER, INC. 3.19%Tesla, Inc. 3.46%
Global Unichip Corp 3.14%Alphabet Inc. 3.26%
ORACLE CORPORATION 3.05%Meta Platforms, Inc. 2.97%
NAVER Corporation 3.00%Intel Corp. 2.52%
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORAT 2.55%Walmart Inc. 2.48%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

ARTY and QQQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ARTY
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust
Where it sitsThemes deskCore fund
IssueriSharesInvesco
What it isArtificial intelligenceNasdaq-100, book from QQQM
Total return, 1 year+79.1%+25.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+20.0%+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500+59.1 pts+5.6 pts
Expense rationot published0.18%
Already in the S&P 50049.7%96.7%
Holdings61101

ARTY in plain words

By weight, 50% of ARTY's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 84%. The top ten holdings are 43% of the fund across 61 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +79.1% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 59.1 pts. It sits 5.6% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

QQQ in plain words

QQQ is a index equity fund tracking Nasdaq-100, book from QQQM. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 4, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ARTY or QQQ?
In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ARTY returned +79.1% and QQQ returned +25.6%, so ARTY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
How much do ARTY and QQQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 50% of ARTY and 97% of QQQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are ARTY and QQQ the same kind of fund?
No. ARTY is a thematic ETF and QQQ is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ARTY against QQQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ARTY against QQQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ARTY-QQQ.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources