# ROM (ProShares Ultra Technology)

ProShares · Leveraged ETFs · data as of Sep 30, 2026

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: ROM returned +8.0% where its own daily promise gave +9.6%, 1.6 points short.

## Key facts

- ROM, what XLK did: +5.6%, as of Sep 30, 2026.
- ROM, what 2 times a day gives: +9.6%, as of Sep 30, 2026.
- ROM, what the fund returned: +8.0%, as of Sep 30, 2026.
- ROM, the fund itself cost: −1.6 pts, as of Sep 30, 2026.
- ROM, net assets: $1.4bn (issuer page, as of Sep 30, 2026).
- ROM, expense ratio: 0.93% (485BPOS XBRL, Sep 25, 2026).

## ROM over each window to Sep 30, 2026

| Window | Fund | XLK | +2x the move | Difference | XLK moved about |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 month | +9.7% | +5.1% | +10.2% | −0.4 pts | 18% |
| 3 months | +8.0% | +5.6% | +11.2% | −3.2 pts | 26% |
| 6 months | +97.0% | +45.4% | +90.9% | +6.1 pts | 29% |
| 1 year | +71.9% | +39.6% | +79.2% | −7.3 pts | 26% |
| 3 years | +308.5% | +143.3% | not meaningful over this window | not meaningful over this window | 25% |
| Since launch | +9405.0% | +1992.5% | not meaningful over this window | not meaningful over this window | 22% |

## Every published field

| Field | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Sets out to return | +2 times the daily move of XLK, reset daily | ETFIQ |
| Multiple a holder actually got over the window | +1.43 times, against +2 stated | ETFIQ |
| Underlying | XLK | ETFIQ |
| Segment | sector or country, sector | ETFIQ |
| Net assets | $1.4bn | issuer page, as of Sep 30, 2026 |
| Expense ratio | 0.93% | 485BPOS XBRL, Sep 25, 2026 |
| Launched | Jan 4, 2010 | ETFIQ |
| Underlying volatility over the window | 26% annualized | ETFIQ |

## Questions

### Did ROM return +2 times XLK?

Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, XLK moved +5.6% and ROM returned +8.0%. 2 times that move is +11.2%, so the fund came out 3.2 points short of it.

### Why does ROM not return +2 times over a year?

Because it resets daily. ROM aims at +2 times each day's move, and daily results compound. Over a run where the underlying falls and comes back, compounding a levered daily return leaves a holder behind what +2 times the period move would suggest; over a steady run in one direction it can leave them ahead. The longer the holding, and the more the underlying moves about, the further apart the two figures get.

### Which +2x XLK ETF tracked its stated multiple most closely?

2 issuers sell one. Over the days all of them have been trading, the table on this page ranks them by how far each finished from 2 times the underlying's move. ETFIQ does not rate funds; the order is the figure itself.


## Cite this page

ETFIQ, ROM, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/funds/rom
Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at https://etfiq.com/data/.

HTML: https://etfiq.com/funds/rom  ·  JSON: https://etfiq.com/funds/rom.json