{
 "ticker": "MIC",
 "name": "Corgi MU 2x Daily ETF",
 "issuer": "Corgi",
 "desk": "leverage",
 "url": "https://etfiq.com/funds/mic",
 "html": "https://etfiq.com/funds/mic",
 "markdown": "https://etfiq.com/funds/mic.md",
 "as_of": "2026-09-30",
 "verdict": "Three months to Sep 30, 2026: MIC returned \u221211.6% where its own daily promise gave \u22127.2%, 4.4 points short.",
 "key_facts": [
  {
   "key": "what_mu_did",
   "label": "What MU did",
   "value": "+3.2%",
   "source": null,
   "as_of": "2026-09-30",
   "sentence": "MIC, what MU did: +3.2%, as of Sep 30, 2026."
  },
  {
   "key": "what_2_times_a_day_gives",
   "label": "What 2 times a day gives",
   "value": "\u22127.2%",
   "source": null,
   "as_of": "2026-09-30",
   "sentence": "MIC, what 2 times a day gives: \u22127.2%, as of Sep 30, 2026."
  },
  {
   "key": "what_the_fund_returned",
   "label": "What the fund returned",
   "value": "\u221211.6%",
   "source": null,
   "as_of": "2026-09-30",
   "sentence": "MIC, what the fund returned: \u221211.6%, as of Sep 30, 2026."
  },
  {
   "key": "the_fund_itself_cost",
   "label": "The fund itself cost",
   "value": "\u22124.4 pts",
   "source": null,
   "as_of": "2026-09-30",
   "sentence": "MIC, the fund itself cost: \u22124.4 pts, as of Sep 30, 2026."
  },
  {
   "key": "net_assets",
   "label": "Net assets",
   "value": "$1m",
   "source": "the issuer\u2019s own daily fund list, as of Sep 30, 2026",
   "as_of": "2026-09-30",
   "sentence": "MIC, net assets: $1m (the issuer\u2019s own daily fund list, as of Sep 30, 2026)."
  },
  {
   "key": "expense_ratio",
   "label": "Expense ratio",
   "value": "0.45%",
   "source": "485BPOS XBRL, Jun 5, 2026",
   "as_of": "2026-09-30",
   "sentence": "MIC, expense ratio: 0.45% (485BPOS XBRL, Jun 5, 2026)."
  }
 ],
 "fields": [
  {
   "key": "sets_out_to_return",
   "label": "Sets out to return",
   "value": "+2 times the daily move of MU, reset daily",
   "source": null
  },
  {
   "key": "multiple_a_holder_actually_got_over_the_window",
   "label": "Multiple a holder actually got over the window",
   "value": "MU moved +3.2% over this window, too little to read a multiple from",
   "source": "ETFIQ"
  },
  {
   "key": "underlying",
   "label": "Underlying",
   "value": "MU",
   "source": null
  },
  {
   "key": "segment",
   "label": "Segment",
   "value": "single stock, company",
   "source": null
  },
  {
   "key": "net_assets",
   "label": "Net assets",
   "value": "$1m",
   "source": "the issuer\u2019s own daily fund list, as of Sep 30, 2026"
  },
  {
   "key": "expense_ratio",
   "label": "Expense ratio",
   "value": "0.45%",
   "source": "485BPOS XBRL, Jun 5, 2026"
  },
  {
   "key": "launched",
   "label": "Launched",
   "value": "Jun 30, 2026",
   "source": null
  },
  {
   "key": "underlying_volatility_over_the_window",
   "label": "Underlying volatility over the window",
   "value": "76% annualized",
   "source": "ETFIQ"
  }
 ],
 "periods": [
  {
   "window": "1 month",
   "Fund": "+20.4%",
   "MU": "+11.1%",
   "+2x the move": "+22.2%",
   "Difference": "\u22121.8 pts",
   "MU moved about": "49%"
  },
  {
   "window": "3 months",
   "Fund": "\u221211.6%",
   "MU": "+3.2%",
   "+2x the move": "+6.4%",
   "Difference": "\u221218.0 pts",
   "MU moved about": "76%"
  },
  {
   "window": "Since launch",
   "Fund": "\u221229.2%",
   "MU": "\u22127.7%",
   "+2x the move": "\u221215.4%",
   "Difference": "\u221213.8 pts",
   "MU moved about": "78%"
  }
 ],
 "questions": [
  {
   "q": "Did MIC return +2 times MU?",
   "a": "Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, MU moved +3.2% and MIC returned \u221211.6%. 2 times that move is +6.4%, so the fund came out 18.0 points short of it."
  },
  {
   "q": "Why does MIC not return +2 times over a year?",
   "a": "Because it resets daily. MIC aims at +2 times each day's move, and daily results compound. Over a run where the underlying falls and comes back, compounding a levered daily return leaves a holder behind what +2 times the period move would suggest; over a steady run in one direction it can leave them ahead. The longer the holding, and the more the underlying moves about, the further apart the two figures get."
  },
  {
   "q": "Which +2x MU ETF tracked its stated multiple most closely?",
   "a": "4 issuers sell one. Over the days all of them have been trading, the table on this page ranks them by how far each finished from 2 times the underlying's move. ETFIQ does not rate funds; the order is the figure itself."
  }
 ],
 "generated": "2026-10-01",
 "license": "https://etfiq.com/license/",
 "license_text": "Free to use with attribution. ETFIQ (etfiq.com)."
}