{
 "ticker": "RXL",
 "name": "ProShares Ultra Health Care",
 "issuer": "ProShares",
 "desk": "leverage",
 "url": "https://etfiq.com/funds/RXL",
 "html": "https://etfiq.com/funds/RXL",
 "markdown": "https://etfiq.com/funds/RXL.md",
 "as_of": "2026-09-11",
 "verdict": "Three months to Sep 11, 2026: RXL returned +14.3% where its own daily promise gave +15.5%, 1.3 points short.",
 "key_facts": [
  {
   "key": "what_xlv_did",
   "label": "What XLV did",
   "value": "+8.0%",
   "source": null,
   "as_of": "2026-09-11",
   "sentence": "RXL, what XLV did: +8.0%, as of Sep 11, 2026."
  },
  {
   "key": "what_2_times_a_day_gives",
   "label": "What +2 times a day gives",
   "value": "+15.5%",
   "source": null,
   "as_of": "2026-09-11",
   "sentence": "RXL, what +2 times a day gives: +15.5%, as of Sep 11, 2026."
  },
  {
   "key": "what_the_fund_returned",
   "label": "What the fund returned",
   "value": "+14.3%",
   "source": null,
   "as_of": "2026-09-11",
   "sentence": "RXL, what the fund returned: +14.3%, as of Sep 11, 2026."
  },
  {
   "key": "the_fund_itself_cost",
   "label": "The fund itself cost",
   "value": "\u22121.3 pts",
   "source": null,
   "as_of": "2026-09-11",
   "sentence": "RXL, the fund itself cost: \u22121.3 pts, as of Sep 11, 2026."
  },
  {
   "key": "net_assets",
   "label": "Net assets",
   "value": "$94m",
   "source": "issuer page, as of Sep 11, 2026",
   "as_of": "2026-09-11",
   "sentence": "RXL, net assets: $94m (issuer page, as of Sep 11, 2026)."
  },
  {
   "key": "expense_ratio",
   "label": "Expense ratio",
   "value": "0.95%",
   "source": "485BPOS XBRL, Sep 23, 2025",
   "as_of": "2026-09-11",
   "sentence": "RXL, expense ratio: 0.95% (485BPOS XBRL, Sep 23, 2025)."
  }
 ],
 "fields": [
  {
   "key": "sets_out_to_return",
   "label": "Sets out to return",
   "value": "+2 times the daily move of XLV, reset daily",
   "source": null
  },
  {
   "key": "multiple_a_holder_actually_got_over_the_window",
   "label": "Multiple a holder actually got over the window",
   "value": "+1.79 times, against +2 stated",
   "source": "ETFIQ"
  },
  {
   "key": "underlying",
   "label": "Underlying",
   "value": "XLV",
   "source": null
  },
  {
   "key": "segment",
   "label": "Segment",
   "value": "sector or country, sector",
   "source": null
  },
  {
   "key": "net_assets",
   "label": "Net assets",
   "value": "$94m",
   "source": "issuer page, as of Sep 11, 2026"
  },
  {
   "key": "expense_ratio",
   "label": "Expense ratio",
   "value": "0.95%",
   "source": "485BPOS XBRL, Sep 23, 2025"
  },
  {
   "key": "launched",
   "label": "Launched",
   "value": "Jan 4, 2010",
   "source": null
  },
  {
   "key": "underlying_volatility_over_the_window",
   "label": "Underlying volatility over the window",
   "value": "19% annualized",
   "source": "ETFIQ"
  }
 ],
 "periods": [
  {
   "window": "1 month",
   "Fund": "\u22124.3%",
   "XLV": "\u22121.8%",
   "+2x the move": "\u22123.7%",
   "Difference": "\u22120.6 pts",
   "XLV moved about": "20%"
  },
  {
   "window": "3 months",
   "Fund": "+14.3%",
   "XLV": "+8.0%",
   "+2x the move": "+16.0%",
   "Difference": "\u22121.7 pts",
   "XLV moved about": "19%"
  },
  {
   "window": "6 months",
   "Fund": "+18.8%",
   "XLV": "+11.3%",
   "+2x the move": "+22.7%",
   "Difference": "\u22123.9 pts",
   "XLV moved about": "18%"
  },
  {
   "window": "1 year",
   "Fund": "+33.6%",
   "XLV": "+20.4%",
   "+2x the move": "+40.8%",
   "Difference": "\u22127.2 pts",
   "XLV moved about": "16%"
  },
  {
   "window": "3 years",
   "Fund": "+33.7%",
   "XLV": "+30.9%",
   "+2x the move": "+61.8%",
   "Difference": "\u221228.1 pts",
   "XLV moved about": "15%"
  },
  {
   "window": "Since launch",
   "Fund": "+1823.7%",
   "XLV": "+592.6%",
   "+2x the move": "not meaningful over this window",
   "Difference": "not meaningful over this window",
   "XLV moved about": "16%"
  }
 ],
 "questions": [
  {
   "q": "Did RXL return +2 times XLV?",
   "a": "Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, XLV moved +8.0% and RXL returned +14.3%. 2 times that move is +16.0%, so the fund came out 1.7 points short of it."
  },
  {
   "q": "Why does RXL not return +2 times over a year?",
   "a": "Because it resets daily. RXL aims at +2 times each day's move, and daily results compound. Over a run where the underlying falls and comes back, compounding a levered daily return leaves a holder behind what +2 times the period move would suggest; over a steady run in one direction it can leave them ahead. The longer the holding, and the more the underlying moves about, the further apart the two figures get."
  },
  {
   "q": "Which +2x XLV ETF tracked its stated multiple most closely?",
   "a": "2 issuers sell one. Over the days all of them have been trading, the table on this page ranks them by how far each finished from 2 times the underlying's move. ETFIQ does not rate funds; the order is the arithmetic."
  }
 ],
 "generated": "2026-09-13",
 "license": "Free to use with attribution. ETFIQ (etfiq.com)."
}