{
 "ticker": "RGTU",
 "name": "Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF",
 "issuer": "Tradr",
 "desk": "leverage",
 "url": "https://etfiq.com/funds/RGTU",
 "html": "https://etfiq.com/funds/RGTU",
 "markdown": "https://etfiq.com/funds/RGTU.md",
 "as_of": "2026-09-11",
 "verdict": "Three months to Sep 11, 2026: RGTU returned \u221257.1% where its own daily promise gave \u221255.3%, 1.7 points short.",
 "key_facts": [
  {
   "key": "what_rgti_did",
   "label": "What RGTI did",
   "value": "\u221227.2%",
   "source": null,
   "as_of": "2026-09-11",
   "sentence": "RGTU, what RGTI did: \u221227.2%, as of Sep 11, 2026."
  },
  {
   "key": "what_2_times_a_day_gives",
   "label": "What +2 times a day gives",
   "value": "\u221255.3%",
   "source": null,
   "as_of": "2026-09-11",
   "sentence": "RGTU, what +2 times a day gives: \u221255.3%, as of Sep 11, 2026."
  },
  {
   "key": "what_the_fund_returned",
   "label": "What the fund returned",
   "value": "\u221257.1%",
   "source": null,
   "as_of": "2026-09-11",
   "sentence": "RGTU, what the fund returned: \u221257.1%, as of Sep 11, 2026."
  },
  {
   "key": "the_fund_itself_cost",
   "label": "The fund itself cost",
   "value": "\u22121.7 pts",
   "source": null,
   "as_of": "2026-09-11",
   "sentence": "RGTU, the fund itself cost: \u22121.7 pts, as of Sep 11, 2026."
  },
  {
   "key": "net_assets",
   "label": "Net assets",
   "value": "$14m",
   "source": "source, as filed for Jun 30, 2026",
   "as_of": "2026-09-11",
   "sentence": "RGTU, net assets: $14m (source, as filed for Jun 30, 2026)."
  },
  {
   "key": "expense_ratio",
   "label": "Expense ratio",
   "value": "1.30%",
   "source": "485BPOS XBRL, Jul 23, 2026",
   "as_of": "2026-09-11",
   "sentence": "RGTU, expense ratio: 1.30% (485BPOS XBRL, Jul 23, 2026)."
  }
 ],
 "fields": [
  {
   "key": "sets_out_to_return",
   "label": "Sets out to return",
   "value": "+2 times the daily move of RGTI, reset daily",
   "source": null
  },
  {
   "key": "multiple_a_holder_actually_got_over_the_window",
   "label": "Multiple a holder actually got over the window",
   "value": "+2.1 times, against +2 stated",
   "source": "ETFIQ"
  },
  {
   "key": "underlying",
   "label": "Underlying",
   "value": "RGTI",
   "source": null
  },
  {
   "key": "segment",
   "label": "Segment",
   "value": "single stock, company",
   "source": null
  },
  {
   "key": "net_assets",
   "label": "Net assets",
   "value": "$14m",
   "source": "source, as filed for Jun 30, 2026"
  },
  {
   "key": "expense_ratio",
   "label": "Expense ratio",
   "value": "1.30%",
   "source": "485BPOS XBRL, Jul 23, 2026"
  },
  {
   "key": "launched",
   "label": "Launched",
   "value": "Jun 24, 2025",
   "source": null
  },
  {
   "key": "underlying_volatility_over_the_window",
   "label": "Underlying volatility over the window",
   "value": "83% annualized",
   "source": "ETFIQ"
  }
 ],
 "periods": [
  {
   "window": "1 month",
   "Fund": "\u221234.8%",
   "RGTI": "\u221217.1%",
   "+2x the move": "\u221234.2%",
   "Difference": "\u22120.6 pts",
   "RGTI moved about": "70%"
  },
  {
   "window": "3 months",
   "Fund": "\u221257.1%",
   "RGTI": "\u221227.2%",
   "+2x the move": "\u221254.4%",
   "Difference": "\u22122.6 pts",
   "RGTI moved about": "83%"
  },
  {
   "window": "6 months",
   "Fund": "\u221249.1%",
   "RGTI": "\u22125.6%",
   "+2x the move": "\u221211.1%",
   "Difference": "\u221238.0 pts",
   "RGTI moved about": "101%"
  },
  {
   "window": "1 year",
   "Fund": "\u221275.7%",
   "RGTI": "\u22128.5%",
   "+2x the move": "\u221217.0%",
   "Difference": "\u221258.7 pts",
   "RGTI moved about": "107%"
  },
  {
   "window": "Since launch",
   "Fund": "\u221259.0%",
   "RGTI": "+32.8%",
   "+2x the move": "+65.6%",
   "Difference": "\u2212124.6 pts",
   "RGTI moved about": "105%"
  }
 ],
 "questions": [
  {
   "q": "Did RGTU return +2 times RGTI?",
   "a": "Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, RGTI moved \u221227.2% and RGTU returned \u221257.1%. 2 times that move is \u221254.4%, so the fund came out 2.6 points short of it."
  },
  {
   "q": "Why does RGTU not return +2 times over a year?",
   "a": "Because it resets daily. RGTU aims at +2 times each day's move, and daily results compound. Over a run where the underlying falls and comes back, compounding a levered daily return leaves a holder behind what +2 times the period move would suggest; over a steady run in one direction it can leave them ahead. The longer the holding, and the more the underlying moves about, the further apart the two figures get."
  },
  {
   "q": "Which +2x RGTI ETF tracked its stated multiple most closely?",
   "a": "3 issuers sell one. Over the days all of them have been trading, the table on this page ranks them by how far each finished from 2 times the underlying's move. ETFIQ does not rate funds; the order is the arithmetic."
  }
 ],
 "generated": "2026-09-13",
 "license": "Free to use with attribution. ETFIQ (etfiq.com)."
}