{
 "ticker": "GLXU",
 "name": "T-REX 2X LONG GLXY DAILY TARGET ETF",
 "issuer": "T-REX",
 "desk": "leverage",
 "url": "https://etfiq.com/funds/GLXU",
 "html": "https://etfiq.com/funds/GLXU",
 "markdown": "https://etfiq.com/funds/GLXU.md",
 "as_of": "2026-09-11",
 "verdict": "Three months to Sep 11, 2026: GLXU returned \u221258.3% where its own daily promise gave \u221256.4%, 1.9 points short.",
 "key_facts": [
  {
   "key": "what_glxy_did",
   "label": "What GLXY did",
   "value": "\u221226.9%",
   "source": null,
   "as_of": "2026-09-11",
   "sentence": "GLXU, what GLXY did: \u221226.9%, as of Sep 11, 2026."
  },
  {
   "key": "what_2_times_a_day_gives",
   "label": "What +2 times a day gives",
   "value": "\u221256.4%",
   "source": null,
   "as_of": "2026-09-11",
   "sentence": "GLXU, what +2 times a day gives: \u221256.4%, as of Sep 11, 2026."
  },
  {
   "key": "what_the_fund_returned",
   "label": "What the fund returned",
   "value": "\u221258.3%",
   "source": null,
   "as_of": "2026-09-11",
   "sentence": "GLXU, what the fund returned: \u221258.3%, as of Sep 11, 2026."
  },
  {
   "key": "the_fund_itself_cost",
   "label": "The fund itself cost",
   "value": "\u22121.9 pts",
   "source": null,
   "as_of": "2026-09-11",
   "sentence": "GLXU, the fund itself cost: \u22121.9 pts, as of Sep 11, 2026."
  },
  {
   "key": "net_assets",
   "label": "Net assets",
   "value": "$18m",
   "source": "source, as filed for Jun 30, 2026",
   "as_of": "2026-09-11",
   "sentence": "GLXU, net assets: $18m (source, as filed for Jun 30, 2026)."
  },
  {
   "key": "expense_ratio",
   "label": "Expense ratio",
   "value": "1.50%",
   "source": "485BPOS XBRL, Apr 30, 2026",
   "as_of": "2026-09-11",
   "sentence": "GLXU, expense ratio: 1.50% (485BPOS XBRL, Apr 30, 2026)."
  }
 ],
 "fields": [
  {
   "key": "sets_out_to_return",
   "label": "Sets out to return",
   "value": "+2 times the daily move of GLXY, reset daily",
   "source": null
  },
  {
   "key": "multiple_a_holder_actually_got_over_the_window",
   "label": "Multiple a holder actually got over the window",
   "value": "+2.17 times, against +2 stated",
   "source": "ETFIQ"
  },
  {
   "key": "underlying",
   "label": "Underlying",
   "value": "GLXY",
   "source": null
  },
  {
   "key": "segment",
   "label": "Segment",
   "value": "single stock, company",
   "source": null
  },
  {
   "key": "net_assets",
   "label": "Net assets",
   "value": "$18m",
   "source": "source, as filed for Jun 30, 2026"
  },
  {
   "key": "expense_ratio",
   "label": "Expense ratio",
   "value": "1.50%",
   "source": "485BPOS XBRL, Apr 30, 2026"
  },
  {
   "key": "launched",
   "label": "Launched",
   "value": "Aug 8, 2025",
   "source": null
  },
  {
   "key": "underlying_volatility_over_the_window",
   "label": "Underlying volatility over the window",
   "value": "89% annualized",
   "source": "ETFIQ"
  }
 ],
 "periods": [
  {
   "window": "1 month",
   "Fund": "+24.8%",
   "GLXY": "+15.8%",
   "+2x the move": "+31.5%",
   "Difference": "\u22126.7 pts",
   "GLXY moved about": "81%"
  },
  {
   "window": "3 months",
   "Fund": "\u221258.3%",
   "GLXY": "\u221226.9%",
   "+2x the move": "\u221253.7%",
   "Difference": "\u22124.6 pts",
   "GLXY moved about": "89%"
  },
  {
   "window": "6 months",
   "Fund": "\u221226.3%",
   "GLXY": "+9.2%",
   "+2x the move": "+18.3%",
   "Difference": "\u221244.6 pts",
   "GLXY moved about": "89%"
  },
  {
   "window": "1 year",
   "Fund": "\u221275.2%",
   "GLXY": "\u221215.5%",
   "+2x the move": "\u221231.0%",
   "Difference": "\u221244.3 pts",
   "GLXY moved about": "92%"
  },
  {
   "window": "Since launch",
   "Fund": "\u221275.2%",
   "GLXY": "\u221212.2%",
   "+2x the move": "\u221224.3%",
   "Difference": "\u221250.9 pts",
   "GLXY moved about": "91%"
  }
 ],
 "questions": [
  {
   "q": "Did GLXU return +2 times GLXY?",
   "a": "Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, GLXY moved \u221226.9% and GLXU returned \u221258.3%. 2 times that move is \u221253.7%, so the fund came out 4.6 points short of it."
  },
  {
   "q": "Why does GLXU not return +2 times over a year?",
   "a": "Because it resets daily. GLXU aims at +2 times each day's move, and daily results compound. Over a run where the underlying falls and comes back, compounding a levered daily return leaves a holder behind what +2 times the period move would suggest; over a steady run in one direction it can leave them ahead. The longer the holding, and the more the underlying moves about, the further apart the two figures get."
  },
  {
   "q": "Which +2x GLXY ETF tracked its stated multiple most closely?",
   "a": "3 issuers sell one. Over the days all of them have been trading, the table on this page ranks them by how far each finished from 2 times the underlying's move. ETFIQ does not rate funds; the order is the arithmetic."
  }
 ],
 "generated": "2026-09-13",
 "license": "Free to use with attribution. ETFIQ (etfiq.com)."
}