{
 "schema": 1,
 "system": "askiq",
 "label": "askIQ (ETFIQ)",
 "model": "claude-sonnet-5-5",
 "adapter": "askiq-local-worker",
 "stub": false,
 "live_data_date": "2026-10-29",
 "mcp_data_date": "2026-10-29",
 "site_data_date": "2026-10-29",
 "date_drift": false,
 "questions_file": "data/benchmark/questions-2026-10-29.json",
 "questions_sha1": "a918294edc6f6dfe715fd6ec687cca154f60d7d8",
 "set": "sample100",
 "run_at": "2026-10-30T14:07:53.763Z",
 "budget_usd": 3,
 "cost_usd": 1.894612,
 "answers": [
  {
   "id": "q001",
   "at": "2026-10-30T13:57:35.001Z",
   "ms": 5986,
   "text": "ETFIQ gives a 1-year total return of **+6.8%** for [ALTY](https://etfiq.com/funds/alty), as of Oct 29, 2026. It computes this from Tiingo daily prices.\n\nThe page labels this the \"1 year\" window ending Oct 29, 2026. It doesn't state the exact start date or say whether distributions are reinvested, so I can't confirm the window began on Oct 29, 2025. ETFIQ gives no other return for that exact date range.\n\nFor comparison, the S&P 500 (SPY) returned +13.1% over the same 1-year window.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.049328
  },
  {
   "id": "q002",
   "at": "2026-10-30T13:57:40.988Z",
   "ms": 7715,
   "text": "GMOD's 1-year total return was **+11.8%**, as of Oct 29, 2026. [ETFIQ](https://etfiq.com/funds/gmod) computes this from Tiingo daily prices. The S&P 500 (SPY) returned +13.1% over the same 1-year window.\n\n- ETFIQ labels this number \"Total return, 1 year\". It doesn't state the exact start date or say how distributions are treated. The window should run from about Oct 29, 2025, and the fund has traded since Oct 14, 2025. I can't confirm that distributions are reinvested.\n- The percentage is the fund's price change plus distributions over that period.\n- ETFIQ doesn't publish a separate return for the exact Oct 29, 2025 to Oct 29, 2026 dates.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.017932
  },
  {
   "id": "q007",
   "at": "2026-10-30T13:57:48.703Z",
   "ms": 8507,
   "text": "[CAOS price: does it move with the S&P 500?](https://etfiq.com/funds/caos) \"Over the year to Oct 29, 2026, CAOS returned 1.5%.\" (as of Oct 29, 2026)\n\nThat 1-year total return is **+1.5%**. ETFIQ's table labels it \"Total return\". The fund page measures 52 weekly returns, from Oct 30, 2025 to Oct 29, 2026. ETFIQ computes it from Tiingo daily prices.\n\n- The S&P 500 (SPY) returned +13.1% over the same 1-year window.\n- T-bills returned +3.7% over the 52 weeks. CAOS was 2.2 percentage points behind them.\n\nThe page prints the return rounded to one decimal. It doesn't give a more precise number, and it doesn't say how distributions are treated. I can't confirm from the page that they are reinvested.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.02102
  },
  {
   "id": "q008",
   "at": "2026-10-30T13:57:57.210Z",
   "ms": 8570,
   "text": "DBMF's 1-year total return to Oct 29, 2026 was **+21.6%** ([DBMF](https://etfiq.com/funds/dbmf), as of Oct 29, 2026). The S&P 500 (SPY) returned +13.1% over the same window.\n\n- The page labels this number \"Total return\". The data I have doesn't say that distributions are reinvested.\n- The page doesn't give the exact start date of the 1-year window. It doesn't confirm Oct 29, 2025. Its weekly measures run from Oct 30, 2025 to Oct 29, 2026, and over those 52 weeks DBMF's total return was +21.5%.\n- If you need exactly Oct 29, 2025 as the start, ETFIQ doesn't publish that return.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.021838
  },
  {
   "id": "q013",
   "at": "2026-10-30T13:58:05.780Z",
   "ms": 7711,
   "text": "FCOR's 1-year total return was **−1.7%** as of Oct 29, 2026. ETFIQ computes it from Tiingo daily prices. The page doesn't say outright that distributions are reinvested, but it labels the number \"total return.\"\n\nThe page shows the window as \"1 year\" ending Oct 29, 2026. It doesn't print the start date. Source: [FCOR](https://etfiq.com/funds/fcor).\n\nFor context, the 12-month yield was 4.9% as of Oct 29, 2026. That is on the fund's starting price and includes capital gains. The price is below its high by 3.2%.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.015762
  },
  {
   "id": "q014",
   "at": "2026-10-30T13:58:13.491Z",
   "ms": 8279,
   "text": "[FEMB price: First Trust Emerging Markets Local…](https://etfiq.com/funds/femb)\n\n\"FEMB returned +2.3% over the year to Oct 29, 2026, charges 0.85% a year and holds $373m in net assets on Oct 28, 2026.\" (as of 2026-10-29)\n\nSo the one-year total return is **+2.3%**, for the year ending Oct 29, 2026. ETFIQ computes it from Tiingo daily prices, and the 12-month yield number uses Tiingo distributions. It doesn't state the exact start-date price or the exact reinvestment method. ETFIQ doesn't publish a separate number for a window starting exactly on Oct 29, 2025, so I'm giving you the page's 1-year window.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.019376
  },
  {
   "id": "q019",
   "at": "2026-10-30T13:58:21.771Z",
   "ms": 7144,
   "text": "IMAR's total return over the 1-year window was **+4.7%**, as of Oct 29, 2026. That is on [ETFIQ's IMAR page](https://etfiq.com/funds/imar).\n\n- The page's table column is labelled \"Total return\". ETFIQ does not state the exact start date of the 1-year window. I'm assuming it runs from Oct 29, 2025, so check that against the page.\n- Over the same window, EFA's price return was +9.7%. That puts IMAR 5.0 percentage points behind EFA.\n- EFA is the fund's reference index. Its number is a price return, not a total return.\n- Current outcome period: Feb 28, 2026 to Feb 28, 2027. In that period, the fund is up 0.6% since the start, and EFA is down 1.0%.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.017144
  },
  {
   "id": "q020",
   "at": "2026-10-30T13:58:28.915Z",
   "ms": 7336,
   "text": "NJUN's total return over the 1-year window was **+5.2%**, as of Oct 29, 2026. That is on [ETFIQ's NJUN page](https://etfiq.com/funds/njun), which labels the column \"Total return.\"\n\n- **Caveat on the dates:** ETFIQ's window is labelled \"1 year.\" The page does not state exact start and end dates, so I can't confirm it starts on Oct 29, 2025. ETFIQ does not publish a custom date-range return for a single fund.\n- **Reinvestment:** The page does not say how distributions are treated in this number.\n- **Comparison:** QQQ's price return over the same 1-year window was +12.5%. The gap is −7.3 percentage points.\n- **Outcome period:** The fund's current outcome period runs May 31, 2026 to May 31, 2027. The 1-year window spans more than one outcome period.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.017454
  },
  {
   "id": "q025",
   "at": "2026-10-30T13:58:36.251Z",
   "ms": 8199,
   "text": "[BWET: Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF price](https://etfiq.com/funds/bwet): \"BWET returned +5,105.8% over the year to Oct 29, 2026, charges 4.68% a year and holds $178m in net assets on Oct 28, 2026.\"\n\nThat is the 1-year total return as of Oct 29, 2026. ETFIQ computes it from Tiingo daily prices. The window is the year ending Oct 29, 2026, which matches the dates you asked about.\n\nETFIQ's source line doesn't say whether distributions are reinvested, so I can't confirm that for this number. ETFIQ labels it \"Total return.\"\n\nBWET holds tanker freight futures, so a return this large reflects a very volatile fund. The fund is also 6.3% below its high as of Oct 29, 2026.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.01999
  },
  {
   "id": "q026",
   "at": "2026-10-30T13:58:44.450Z",
   "ms": 6910,
   "text": "**CMDY's total return over the past year was +34.4%, as of Oct 29, 2026.** ETFIQ computes it from Tiingo daily prices, and the [CMDY fund page](https://etfiq.com/funds/cmdy) lists it as \"Total return, 1 year.\" The window runs to the Oct 29, 2026 close.\n\nThe page does not say whether the window starts exactly on Oct 29, 2025, and I have no way to confirm that. ETFIQ also publishes no custom-date return for this fund.\n\nThe fund's last payment was $6.2857 per share, with an ex-date of Dec 16, 2025. That date falls inside the window.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.016212
  },
  {
   "id": "q031",
   "at": "2026-10-30T13:58:51.360Z",
   "ms": 7179,
   "text": "**DOJE lost 59.7%** over the year to Oct 29, 2026 (1-year total return, as of Oct 29, 2026). The tool doesn't state whether this number assumes distributions were reinvested. It calls the number \"total return\", computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices.\n\n[REX-Osprey DOGE ETF (DOJE)](https://etfiq.com/funds/doje) page: \"Over the year to Oct 29, 2026, DOJE lost 59.7%, against −59.2% for Dogecoin.\"\n\n- Dogecoin over the same days: −59.2%.\n- Difference: −0.5 percentage points.\n- DOJE first traded Sep 18, 2025. The 1-year window starts about a month later, so it fits within the fund's history.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.019847
  },
  {
   "id": "q037",
   "at": "2026-10-30T13:58:58.539Z",
   "ms": 7518,
   "text": "[AIYY income ETF price: am I ahead of AI?](https://etfiq.com/funds/aiyy)\n\n\"Over the year to Oct 29, 2026, AIYY paid 32.7% in cash and lost 40.0% in total, against −30.7% for AI.\" (as of Oct 29, 2026)\n\n- **Total return, 1 year, to Oct 29, 2026: −40.0%.** ETFIQ computes it from Tiingo daily prices and distributions.\n- Price return over the same year: −70.0%.\n- Cash paid over the year was 32.7% of its starting price.\n- AI (C3.ai), the stock AIYY writes options on, returned −30.7%. AIYY was 9.3 percentage points behind.\n\nETFIQ's 1-year window ends on Oct 29, 2026. Its page doesn't state the exact start date.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.02167
  },
  {
   "id": "q043",
   "at": "2026-10-30T13:59:06.058Z",
   "ms": 8070,
   "text": "BOEU's total return over the 1 year to Oct 29, 2026 was **−48.4%**. That is the \"Total return\" in ETFIQ's 1-year window on the [BOEU page](https://etfiq.com/funds/boeu), computed from Tiingo daily prices and distributions. ETFIQ doesn't print the window's exact start date. I'm reading it as Oct 29, 2025, which is one year before the as-of date.\n\n- BA, the underlying stock, returned −19.2% over the same window.\n- Twice BA's daily moves gave −38.4%. BOEU was 10.0 percentage points below that.\n- The fund resets daily, so a multi-month result usually doesn't equal 2 times the stock's return.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.025263
  },
  {
   "id": "q049",
   "at": "2026-10-30T13:59:14.129Z",
   "ms": 8104,
   "text": "**BUYO returned +24.8% over the 1 year to Oct 29, 2026.** That is ETFIQ's published 1-year total return for [BUYO](https://etfiq.com/funds/buyo), computed from Tiingo daily prices.\n\n- The same page shows IWV, which tracks the Russell 3000 and is BUYO's benchmark, at +13.0% over the same days. BUYO was 11.8 percentage points ahead.\n- BUYO paid one distribution in that span, $0.0034 per share (ex-date Dec 22, 2025). It is small.\n- The page does not state the exact start date of the 1-year window. It also does not say how distributions are treated in the calculation. I can't confirm from it that the window starts on Oct 29, 2025 or that distributions are reinvested.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.019621
  },
  {
   "id": "q055",
   "at": "2026-10-30T13:59:22.233Z",
   "ms": 6615,
   "text": "ARKX's 1-year total return to Oct 29, 2026 was **−1.2%**. ETFIQ computes it from Tiingo daily prices, as of 2026-10-29. This is the data on [ARKX's page](https://etfiq.com/funds/arkx).\n\n- The page says \"Over the year to Oct 29, 2026, ARKX lost 1.2%, against 13.2% for VOO.\"\n- VOO is ARKX's benchmark, the S&P 500 Index measured through VOO. ARKX trailed it by 14.4 percentage points over the same year.\n\nETFIQ's 1-year window ends on Oct 29, 2026. The tool doesn't state the start date or confirm that distributions are reinvested. The label is \"total return\", so I'm treating the number as the total return you asked about.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.01938
  },
  {
   "id": "q061",
   "at": "2026-10-30T13:59:28.848Z",
   "ms": 6305,
   "text": "[AFIF Dividend History, Yield and Dates](https://etfiq.com/funds/afif/dividends/): \"AFIF paid $0.3897 a share in the 12 months to Oct 29, 2026, in 12 payments.\" (as of Oct 29, 2026)\n\nThat is a **4.1% yield** on its price of $9.45 on Oct 29, 2025, the first day of those 12 months. The yield is the sum of the payments divided by that starting price.\n\nThe last payment was $0.024831 a share, with an ex-date of Oct 29, 2026. AFIF pays monthly. The data comes from Tiingo end-of-day distributions, as shown on the [AFIF fund page](https://etfiq.com/funds/afif).",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.0202
  },
  {
   "id": "q062",
   "at": "2026-10-30T13:59:35.153Z",
   "ms": 4776,
   "text": "Distributions paid by [BSMQ](https://etfiq.com/funds/bsmq) over the year to Oct 29, 2026 were **2.7%** of its starting price, the price on Oct 29, 2025. This is ETFIQ's \"12-month yield, capital gains included, on its starting price\", as of Oct 29, 2026. ETFIQ computes it from Tiingo daily prices and distributions.\n\n- The fund pays monthly. Its last payment was $0.0531, with an ex-date of Oct 19, 2026.\n- ETFIQ gives a rounded percentage here. It doesn't give the dollar total or the Oct 29, 2025 price, so I can't give a more precise number.\n- Over the same year, BSMQ's total return was +2.2% (as of Oct 29, 2026).",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.016657
  },
  {
   "id": "q073",
   "at": "2026-10-30T13:59:39.929Z",
   "ms": 8339,
   "text": "[COYY Dividend History, Yield and Dates](https://etfiq.com/funds/coyy/dividends/): \"COYY paid $36.6754 a share in the 12 months to Oct 29, 2026, in 52 payments.\" (as of 2026-10-29)\n\nThe answer is **42.9%**. That is $36.6754 a share, paid over the 12 months to Oct 29, 2026, as a percent of the $85.56 price on Oct 29, 2025, the first day of that period.\n\n- The 52 payments had ex-dates from Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026. COYY pays weekly.\n- This is cash paid only. Over the same year, COYY's total return was −57.0% and its price return was −84.8% ([COYY](https://etfiq.com/funds/coyy), as of 2026-10-29).\n- GraniteShares estimates that 96.1% of the latest payout was return of capital.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.023061
  },
  {
   "id": "q074",
   "at": "2026-10-30T13:59:48.268Z",
   "ms": 5024,
   "text": "[EIPI Dividend History, Yield and Dates](https://etfiq.com/funds/eipi/dividends/): \"EIPI paid $1.50 a share in the 12 months to Oct 29, 2026, in 12 payments.\" (as of Oct 29, 2026)\n\n**The answer is 7.7%.** That is cash paid over the 12 months to Oct 29, 2026, as a percent of its price of $19.54 on Oct 29, 2025. The 12 payments had ex-dates from Nov 21, 2025 to Oct 21, 2026. ETFIQ computed this from Tiingo daily prices and distributions, as of Oct 29, 2026. See the [EIPI fund page](https://etfiq.com/funds/eipi).\n\nTwo other numbers are different:\n- Over the same year, EIPI's total return was +25.9%. That includes price change as well as cash paid.\n- ETFIQ also shows cash paid over the last 12 months as 6.5% of today's price, not of the starting price.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.023761
  },
  {
   "id": "q084",
   "at": "2026-10-30T13:59:53.292Z",
   "ms": 5764,
   "text": "**Answer: 2.1%.**\n\nETFIQ's \"12-month yield, capital gains included, on its starting price\" for [BBC](https://etfiq.com/funds/bbc) is **2.1%**, as of Oct 29, 2026. It is computed from Tiingo daily prices and distributions. The starting price is the Oct 29, 2025 price, so this matches your question.\n\nBBC pays once a year. The last payment was **$0.6554**, with an ex-date of Dec 22, 2025, per Tiingo end-of-day distributions. That payment falls inside your window. ETFIQ's data doesn't show any other payment in the window.\n\nI did not get the Oct 29, 2025 price as a separate number, so I can't recompute the percentage myself. The 2.1% is ETFIQ's published rounded number.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.018906
  },
  {
   "id": "q085",
   "at": "2026-10-30T13:59:59.056Z",
   "ms": 5444,
   "text": "DIEM's distributions over the year to Oct 29, 2026 were **3.4%** of its starting price. The starting price is the price on Oct 29, 2025. The [DIEM fund page](https://etfiq.com/funds/diem) gives this as its \"12-month yield, capital gains included, on its starting price\", as of Oct 29, 2026. ETFIQ computed it from Tiingo daily prices and distributions.\n\nThe latest payment was $0.2298, with an ex-date of Sep 18, 2026. The fund pays quarterly.\n\nI did not find the dollar total of the four payments or the Oct 29, 2025 price on the page, so I can't show the arithmetic behind the 3.4%.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.016778
  },
  {
   "id": "q096",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:00:04.500Z",
   "ms": 6017,
   "text": "[APRW buffer ETF price: where does it stand today?](https://etfiq.com/funds/aprw)\n\n\"Since Apr 1, 2026, APRW returned 7.7%, against SPY's 18.3% price return.\" (as of 2026-04-01)\n\nThe starting cap for the Apr 1, 2026 to Mar 31, 2027 outcome period is **+11.9%**. ETFIQ lists it as the \"Starting cap\" on the [APRW page](https://etfiq.com/funds/aprw), as of Oct 29, 2026. The page does not say whether this cap is before or after fees. It does not give a separate before-fee cap.\n\nWhere the fund stands now (Oct 29, 2026):\n- The page shows the band state as \"At cap\".\n- The fund can still gain 3.2% from today's fund price.\n- The expense ratio is 0.74%, from the issuer page dated Oct 29, 2026.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.02069
  },
  {
   "id": "q097",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:00:10.517Z",
   "ms": 6047,
   "text": "[BALT buffer ETF price: where does it stand today?](https://etfiq.com/funds/balt)\n\n\"Since Sep 30, 2026, BALT returned 0.5%, against SPY's 0.9% price return.\" (as of 2026-09-30)\n\n**The starting cap is +2.4%** for the outcome period Sep 30, 2026 to Dec 31, 2026, per ETFIQ's [BALT page](https://etfiq.com/funds/balt) (data as of Oct 29, 2026).\n\n- The cap is measured on SPY, the fund's reference index. ETFIQ lists it as the starting cap. It does not label it as before or after fees, and I have no separate number for that.\n- The fund's expense ratio is 0.69% (issuer page, Oct 29, 2026).\n- The buffer is 20%.\n- From today's fund price, the fund can still gain 1.8% before it reaches the cap (as of Oct 29, 2026).",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.020909
  },
  {
   "id": "q126",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:00:16.564Z",
   "ms": 6962,
   "text": "[DDFL buffer ETF price: where does it stand today?](https://etfiq.com/funds/ddfl) \"Since Jun 30, 2026, DDFL returned 2.8%, against SPY's 3.0% price return.\" (as of 2026-06-30)\n\n**DDFL has a 15% buffer.** The outcome period runs Jun 30, 2026 to Jun 30, 2027. The reference asset is SPY. The buffer covers the first 15% of SPY's loss over that period. A SPY loss beyond 15% is not covered. The buffer applies if you hold the fund for the whole period.\n\nAs of Oct 29, 2026, [ETFIQ](https://etfiq.com/funds/ddfl) shows:\n- Protection left: 15.0% of 15.0%, in index points.\n- Fall before the buffer starts, from today's fund price: 3.0%. In index terms the fall is 2.9%.\n- Days left in the period: 244.\n- Starting cap: +10.9%. The fund can still gain 7.7% from today's fund price.\n\nThis is a \"dual directional\" fund. The data I pulled does not state how it treats SPY gains or small losses, so I haven't described that.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.020981
  },
  {
   "id": "q127",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:00:23.526Z",
   "ms": 6194,
   "text": "[DDFM buffer ETF price: where does it stand today?](https://etfiq.com/funds/ddfm) \"Since Feb 28, 2026, DDFM returned 6.2%, against SPY's 12.1% price return.\" (as of 2026-02-28)\n\n**The buffer is 15%.** Over the outcome period from Feb 28, 2026 to Feb 28, 2027, DDFM is built to absorb the first 15% of loss in its reference asset, SPY. This applies only if you hold the fund for the whole period.\n\nWhere it stands as of Oct 29, 2026:\n- Protection left: 15.0% of 15.0%, in index points.\n- Fall before the buffer, from today's fund price: 6.4%.\n- Band state: at cap. The starting cap is +9.8%, and the fund can still gain 2.8% from today's fund price.\n- Days left in the period: 122.\n\nThese are computed by ETFIQ from end-of-day prices and filings. The fund is a dual directional buffer fund, and its expense ratio is 0.79% (issuer page, Oct 29, 2026).",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.020644
  },
  {
   "id": "q146",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:00:29.720Z",
   "ms": 4985,
   "text": "AOA's expense ratio is **0.15%**, per its prospectus filing (485BPOS XBRL) dated Nov 21, 2025. The source is the [AOA page](https://etfiq.com/funds/aoa).\n\nETFIQ labels this number \"Expense ratio\". It does not say whether it is net or gross, so I can't confirm it is the net number. ETFIQ has no dated archive for Nov 21, 2025. This 0.15% is the number the AOA page shows today, and its as-of date is that filing.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.02125
  },
  {
   "id": "q147",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:00:34.705Z",
   "ms": 5985,
   "text": "[DPRE price: VIRTUS DUFF & PHELPS REAL ESTATE…](https://etfiq.com/funds/dpre): \"DPRE returned +3.1% since it first traded on Apr 15, 2026.\" (as of 2026-04-15)\n\nETFIQ publishes an expense ratio of **0.59%** for DPRE, as of Dec 22, 2025. The source is the fund's 485BPOS filing (XBRL), dated Dec 22, 2025.\n\nETFIQ gives one expense ratio number and doesn't label it \"net\" or \"gross\". So I can't say whether 0.59% is the net number after any fee waiver.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.019079
  },
  {
   "id": "q153",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:00:40.690Z",
   "ms": 7212,
   "text": "The expense ratio of [CAOS](https://etfiq.com/funds/caos) is **0.63%**. ETFIQ takes it from the fund's 485BPOS filing (XBRL data) dated Jan 28, 2026.\n\nETFIQ lists this as \"Expense ratio\". It does not say whether the number is net or gross. I can't confirm from the data that 0.63% is the net ratio, as opposed to a gross one.\n\nETFIQ has no archive for Jan 28, 2026. The number above comes from the fund's current page, which still shows that filing.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.017973
  },
  {
   "id": "q154",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:00:47.903Z",
   "ms": 6534,
   "text": "CTAP's expense ratio is **0.10%**. ETFIQ takes it from the fund's 485BPOS filing (XBRL data), dated Dec 3, 2025. See the [CTAP page](https://etfiq.com/funds/ctap).\n\nETFIQ labels this number \"Expense ratio\". It doesn't say whether the number is net or gross, so I can't confirm it is the net ratio. ETFIQ also has no archive for Dec 3, 2025, so I couldn't check what the page showed on that date.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.016086
  },
  {
   "id": "q160",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:00:54.437Z",
   "ms": 6952,
   "text": "The expense ratio for [BSMW](https://etfiq.com/funds/bsmw) is **0.18%** a year. The source is the fund's 485BPOS prospectus filing (XBRL) dated Dec 18, 2025.\n\nETFIQ lists this as the fund's expense ratio and doesn't label it gross or net. I can't confirm from the data that it is the net number. ETFIQ also has no archived page for Dec 18, 2025. The 0.18% comes from the fund page, which shows the filing date, and it is still the number shown there as of Oct 29, 2026.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.017473
  },
  {
   "id": "q161",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:01:01.389Z",
   "ms": 8884,
   "text": "The expense ratio for [CVSB](https://etfiq.com/funds/cvsb) is **0.24%** a year. ETFIQ takes it from the fund's 485BPOS filing (XBRL data) dated Jan 28, 2026.\n\nETFIQ lists one expense ratio. It doesn't say whether that is the net or the gross ratio, and it publishes no separate net number. It also has no archive for Jan 28, 2026, so I couldn't check the number against that date's snapshot.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.017172
  },
  {
   "id": "q167",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:01:10.274Z",
   "ms": 6682,
   "text": "The expense ratio for [BUFS](https://etfiq.com/funds/bufs) is **1.01%**. ETFIQ's source is the fund's 485BPOS filing (XBRL), dated Dec 29, 2025.\n\nETFIQ publishes one expense ratio for BUFS, and it doesn't label that number as gross or net. I can't confirm from the data that 1.01% is the net ratio, or whether the prospectus also stated a separate gross ratio. ETFIQ has no archive page for Dec 29, 2025, so I couldn't check it there.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.018638
  },
  {
   "id": "q168",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:01:16.956Z",
   "ms": 5439,
   "text": "The expense ratio of [DDFF](https://etfiq.com/funds/ddff) is **0.79%** a year. ETFIQ's source is the issuer page, dated Oct 29, 2026.\n\nETFIQ labels this number \"Expense ratio\" and doesn't say whether it is net or gross. It also gives the source as the issuer page, not the prospectus. So I can't confirm from ETFIQ that 0.79% is the net ratio as the prospectus stated it.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.019309
  },
  {
   "id": "q174",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:01:22.395Z",
   "ms": 5830,
   "text": "CMDT's expense ratio is **0.65%**. ETFIQ takes it from the fund's 485BPOS filing (XBRL) dated Oct 24, 2025. You can see it on the [CMDT page](https://etfiq.com/funds/cmdt).\n\nETFIQ lists this as the fund's expense ratio. It doesn't label it as net or gross, so I can't confirm from its data that 0.65% is the net number.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.018928
  },
  {
   "id": "q175",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:01:28.225Z",
   "ms": 5469,
   "text": "The expense ratio for [COMD](https://etfiq.com/funds/comd) is **0.55%**. ETFIQ takes it from the fund's 485BPOS filing (XBRL) dated Feb 26, 2026.\n\nETFIQ lists one expense ratio for COMD, and it doesn't label it as gross or net. I can't confirm from this data that 0.55% is the net number after any fee waiver. ETFIQ also has no archive for Feb 26, 2026, so I couldn't check it against that date's page.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.016326
  },
  {
   "id": "q181",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:01:33.694Z",
   "ms": 23578,
   "text": "ETFIQ does not publish BTCW's net expense ratio as of Aug 12, 2026. It has no archive for that date, and its current page doesn't give a prospectus net expense ratio.\n\nWhat the current [BTCW page](https://etfiq.com/funds/btcw) does show, as of Oct 29, 2026:\n- **Sponsor's fee:** 0.25%, from the fund's 10-Q. The page gives no filing date for it.\n- **Fee waiver:** the sponsor waives the whole fee, and the filing gives no end date.\n\nThese are current numbers, not the prospectus as of Aug 12. The page doesn't state a net fee after the waiver, so I won't work one out.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.018261
  },
  {
   "id": "q182",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:01:57.272Z",
   "ms": 10168,
   "text": "ETFIQ doesn't publish CLNK's net expense ratio as of Sep 28, 2026. Its frozen archive for that date has no fee number for CLNK. The archive's crypto piece, [What a coin costs in a brokerage account](https://etfiq.com/research/2026-09-28/crypto-tracking), lists Chainlink with only one fund and no fee.\n\nThe only fee ETFIQ gives is the current one, on [CLNK's page](https://etfiq.com/funds/clnk), as of Oct 29, 2026:\n\n- **Sponsor's fee:** 0.34%, from the 424B3 prospectus filing.\n- **Fee waiver:** it covered the whole fee, but it ended on Apr 13, 2026. So the fee the trust charges now is the 0.34%.\n\nThe waiver had ended by Sep 28, 2026, but ETFIQ doesn't give a net expense ratio for that date. I can't confirm that the 0.34% was the number stated in the prospectus on that day.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.038344
  },
  {
   "id": "q188",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:02:07.440Z",
   "ms": 7077,
   "text": "APRJ's expense ratio is **0.79%**, from the 497 XBRL filing dated Apr 1, 2026. The source is [ETFIQ's APRJ page](https://etfiq.com/funds/aprj).\n\nETFIQ's page lists this as \"Expense ratio\". It does not say whether the number is net or gross, so I can't confirm it is the net ratio.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.019042
  },
  {
   "id": "q189",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:02:14.518Z",
   "ms": 6936,
   "text": "BIOY's expense ratio is **1.07%**. ETFIQ takes it from the fund's Form 497 XBRL data filed Oct 27, 2025. The source is the [BIOY page](https://etfiq.com/funds/bioy).\n\nETFIQ shows one expense ratio number for this filing. It doesn't say whether that number is gross or net of any fee waiver. I can't confirm it is the \"net\" ratio.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.017649
  },
  {
   "id": "q195",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:02:21.454Z",
   "ms": 7573,
   "text": "The expense ratio for [AVAZ](https://etfiq.com/funds/avaz) is **1.85%**. ETFIQ sources it to the fund's 497 XBRL filing dated May 15, 2026, which is also the day the fund first traded.\n\nETFIQ labels this number \"Expense ratio\". It does not say whether it is net or gross, and it gives no separate net number. I can't confirm from ETFIQ's data that 1.85% is the net number.\n\nETFIQ has no archive for May 15, 2026, so I couldn't check the number against a snapshot from that day.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.01744
  },
  {
   "id": "q196",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:02:29.029Z",
   "ms": 4233,
   "text": "ETFIQ publishes one expense ratio for [BRKL](https://etfiq.com/funds/brkl): **0.45%**. It comes from the fund's 497 XBRL filing dated Jun 29, 2026.\n\nETFIQ's data doesn't say whether that 0.45% is net or gross. It labels the number \"Expense ratio\" only. I can't confirm the \"net\" part from what ETFIQ gives.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.012484
  },
  {
   "id": "q202",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:02:33.262Z",
   "ms": 6904,
   "text": "AFOS's expense ratio is **0.46%**. ETFIQ's number comes from the fund's 485BPOS filing (XBRL data), dated Sep 23, 2026. See the [AFOS fund page](https://etfiq.com/funds/afos).\n\nETFIQ publishes this as the fund's \"Expense ratio\". It does not label it as net or gross, so I can't say whether 0.46% is after fee waivers.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.020764
  },
  {
   "id": "q203",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:02:40.166Z",
   "ms": 6750,
   "text": "BKEM's expense ratio is **0.11%** a year. ETFIQ takes it from the fund's 485BPOS prospectus filing (XBRL) dated Feb 27, 2026. See [BKEM](https://etfiq.com/funds/bkem).\n\nETFIQ labels this number \"Expense ratio\". It doesn't say whether it is gross or net of any fee waiver, so I can't confirm it is the net ratio.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.019589
  },
  {
   "id": "q209",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:02:46.916Z",
   "ms": 6189,
   "text": "ETFIQ publishes an expense ratio of **0.75%** for [AOTG](https://etfiq.com/funds/aotg). It is dated Oct 2, 2026, and the source is the fund's 497 XBRL filing of that date.\n\nETFIQ gives one expense ratio for the fund. It does not split out a gross and a net ratio. So I can't confirm that 0.75% is the net ratio rather than the gross one.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.022148
  },
  {
   "id": "q210",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:02:53.105Z",
   "ms": 4914,
   "text": "ETFIQ publishes an expense ratio of **0.59%** for [BCOR](https://etfiq.com/funds/bcor). It is as of Apr 30, 2026, from the fund's 485BPOS filing (XBRL).\n\nThe page labels this \"Expense ratio\". It doesn't say whether the number is net or gross, so I can't confirm it is the net ratio.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.017041
  },
  {
   "id": "q216",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:02:58.019Z",
   "ms": 5821,
   "text": "[ANEW](https://etfiq.com/funds/anew) had an expense ratio of **0.45%**. ETFIQ takes it from the fund's 485BPOS XBRL filing of Sep 25, 2026.\n\nETFIQ lists one expense ratio. It does not split out a gross and a net ratio, so I can't say whether 0.45% is net of any fee waiver.\n\nThe fund closed and was liquidated on Oct 12, 2026. The 0.45% is the last fee ETFIQ has on file.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.017646
  },
  {
   "id": "q217",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:03:03.841Z",
   "ms": 3587,
   "text": "ETFIQ publishes one expense ratio for [BLSG](https://etfiq.com/funds/blsg): **0.79%**. It comes from the fund's 485BPOS filing (XBRL) dated Feb 27, 2026. ETFIQ doesn't say whether this is a net or gross ratio, and it gives no separate net number.\n\nThe fund closed on Oct 19, 2026, and its last trade was that day. These are its last published numbers.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.013122
  },
  {
   "id": "q226",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:03:07.428Z",
   "ms": 3529,
   "text": "The expense ratio of [COHC](https://etfiq.com/funds/cohc) is **0.45%** a year. The number is as of Jun 29, 2026, from the fund's 497 XBRL filing.\n\nETFIQ gives one expense ratio for COHC. It doesn't label it \"net\" or \"gross\".",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.014829
  },
  {
   "id": "q227",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:03:10.957Z",
   "ms": 4899,
   "text": "ETFIQ lists an expense ratio of **0.70%** for [DFTT](https://etfiq.com/funds/dftt). The source is the fund's 485BPOS filing (XBRL), dated Jul 1, 2025.\n\nETFIQ's data labels this only as \"Expense ratio\". It doesn't say whether the 0.70% is net or gross. I can't confirm from this data that it is the net number.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.015453
  },
  {
   "id": "q241",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:03:15.856Z",
   "ms": 5933,
   "text": "IUSB was **57.59%** of [AOK](https://etfiq.com/funds/aok)'s holdings by weight on Oct 28, 2026. That comes from the issuer's daily holdings file, which was 2 days old when I pulled it. The weight is a share of the fund's total holdings, which is a close proxy for net assets.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.011676
  },
  {
   "id": "q242",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:03:21.790Z",
   "ms": 6523,
   "text": "CERY was **11.979%** of [HEFT](https://etfiq.com/funds/heft)'s net assets on 2026-07-31. That is the weight in the fund's SEC filing for that date. CERY is the State Street SPDR Bloomberg En… fund, and it was HEFT's largest holding.\n\nThe filing is 91 days old as of today, so it may not match the fund's current weights.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.014098
  },
  {
   "id": "q248",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:03:28.313Z",
   "ms": 5642,
   "text": "[BINC Holdings: Top 10, 4,706 Positions, Oct 28, 2026](https://etfiq.com/funds/binc/holdings/): \"As of Oct 28, 2026, BINC's top 10 holdings were 21.6% of the fund, led by Umbs 30YR Tba(reg A) at 4.49%.\" (as of 2026-10-28)\n\n**TREASURY NOTE (2OLD), ticker TNOTE, was 4.33% of BINC's net assets on Oct 28, 2026.** It is the fund's second-largest position. The weight comes from the issuer's daily holdings file, as of Oct 28, 2026, which is 2 days old.\n\nSource: [BINC](https://etfiq.com/funds/binc).",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.035305
  },
  {
   "id": "q254",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:03:33.955Z",
   "ms": 7601,
   "text": "[ARKD Buffer ETF price: its outcome terms](https://etfiq.com/funds/arkd): \"From Jan 2, 2026 to Oct 29, 2026, ARKD returned 2.6%, against ARKK's 9.8% price return.\" (as of 2026-01-02)\n\nARKA was **27.041%** of ARKD's holdings on Jun 30, 2025. That is the weight in the SEC filing for that date, the largest of ARKD's 12 holdings. The source is the [ARKD holdings filing](https://etfiq.com/funds/arkd).\n\nThis book is 487 days old. It is the most recent filing ETFIQ has read for this fund.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.013612
  },
  {
   "id": "q255",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:03:41.556Z",
   "ms": 6590,
   "text": "QSR was **10.966%** of ACKY's holdings on 2026-07-31, according to the [ACKY](https://etfiq.com/funds/acky) holdings filing. That makes it the fund's largest holding.\n\nThe weight is the share of the fund as the SEC filing reports it. The filing is 91 days old. The same weight appears on ETFIQ's [QSR holders page](https://etfiq.com/holdings/restaurant-brands-intl-inc/), where ACKY is the largest holder of QSR.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.018174
  },
  {
   "id": "q256",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:03:48.147Z",
   "ms": 4668,
   "text": "On Oct 28, 2026, the 4LQD 261030C00001060 option made up **98.88%** of [LQTI](https://etfiq.com/funds/lqti)'s net assets. That is the weight in the issuer's daily holdings file, as of 2026-10-28. The book was 2 days old when ETFIQ read it.\n\nThe option is the 2026-10-30 iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF call with a 1.06 strike.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.014231
  },
  {
   "id": "q262",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:03:52.815Z",
   "ms": 5370,
   "text": "GitLab (GTLB) was **3.583%** of [ARWG](https://etfiq.com/funds/arwg)'s net assets on 2026-08-31. That was the fund's largest of 40 holdings.\n\nThe number comes from an SEC filing. ETFIQ has not read a newer filing for this fund, so the book is 60 days old. [ETFIQ's GTLB holders page](https://etfiq.com/holdings/gtlb/) lists the same weight, filed 2026-08-31.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.024288
  },
  {
   "id": "q263",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:03:58.185Z",
   "ms": 10048,
   "text": "ALL (Allstate) was **0.996%** of DEUS's net assets in the holdings book dated 2026-08-31. That is the issuer-published weight, taken from an SEC filing. It was the fund's largest holding in that book. Source: [ETFIQ holdings for ALL](https://etfiq.com/holdings/all/).",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.086521
  },
  {
   "id": "q274",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:04:08.234Z",
   "ms": 5485,
   "text": "[AGIQ Holdings: Top 10 and Full List, Aug 31, 2026](https://etfiq.com/funds/agiq/holdings/): \"As of Aug 31, 2026, AGIQ's top 10 holdings were 58.4% of the fund, led by NVIDIA Corp at 6.49%.\" (as of 2026-08-31)\n\nSo NVDA was **6.486%** of AGIQ's net assets on Aug 31, 2026. That makes it the fund's largest holding. The number comes from an SEC filing and is 60 days old as of today. See [AGIQ](https://etfiq.com/funds/agiq).",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.015917
  },
  {
   "id": "q275",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:04:13.719Z",
   "ms": 5565,
   "text": "[TXG ETFs: 87 Funds That Hold 10X Genomics Inc](https://etfiq.com/holdings/txg/): \"87 thematic and core ETFs hold 10X Genomics Inc, by holdings dated May 31, 2026 to Oct 29, 2026.\" (as of 2026-05-31)\n\n**TXG was 8.90% of ARKG's net assets on Oct 27, 2026.** It was the fund's largest position. The weight comes from the issuer's daily holdings file for that date, as shown on the [ARKG](https://etfiq.com/funds/arkg) page. ARKG held 35 positions that day.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.01748
  },
  {
   "id": "q281",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:04:19.284Z",
   "ms": 5748,
   "text": "NVDS aims for **−1.5 times** the daily move of NVDA, reset daily. The minus sign means it is inverse: it targets 1.5 times the opposite of NVDA's move each day. This comes from [NVDS](https://etfiq.com/funds/nvds), as of Oct 29, 2026.\n\nThe target applies to one day at a time. Over longer periods the result can differ a lot. Over the three months to Oct 29, 2026, NVDA rose 9.7%. A flat −1.5 times that move gives −17.9%, and NVDS returned −16.5%. Over that window ETFIQ measures a multiple of −1.70089 times, against the stated −1.5.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.018224
  },
  {
   "id": "q282",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:04:25.032Z",
   "ms": 4718,
   "text": "AVS aims for **−1 times** the daily move of AVGO, reset daily. The minus sign means it is inverse. This comes from [AVS](https://etfiq.com/funds/avs), as of Oct 29, 2026.\n\nOver the three months to Oct 29, 2026, a holder actually got about −0.93 times, against the −1 stated. In that window AVS returned +10.1%. A −1 times daily return would have given +8.2%.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.016934
  },
  {
   "id": "q283",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:04:29.751Z",
   "ms": 3825,
   "text": "[DSPC price: did it return -1 times SPCX?](https://etfiq.com/funds/dspc) \"Over the month to Oct 29, 2026, DSPC returned 0.3%, against 0.3% for the inverse of SPCX's daily moves.\"\n\nDSPC sets out to return **−1 times** the daily move of SPCX, reset daily (as of Oct 29, 2026). The sign is negative, so it aims to move opposite to SPCX each day.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.019094
  },
  {
   "id": "q290",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:04:33.576Z",
   "ms": 5207,
   "text": "**AXTQ aims for −2 times the daily move of AXTI, reset daily.** The minus sign means it is inverse. This comes from [AXTQ](https://etfiq.com/funds/axtq), as of Oct 29, 2026.\n\nThe aim applies to each day only. Over longer periods the result can differ a lot. Over the window ETFIQ measured, a holder actually got −0.98165 times AXTI's move, against the −2 stated. Since launch on Aug 18, 2026, the fund returned −11.3%, while AXTI returned −26.0%.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.015093
  },
  {
   "id": "q291",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:04:38.783Z",
   "ms": 4785,
   "text": "DUG aims for **−2 times** the daily move of XLE (the Energy Select Sector SPDR), reset daily. This comes from the [DUG page](https://etfiq.com/funds/dug), as of Oct 29, 2026.\n\nOver the three months to Oct 29, 2026, XLE rose 17.2%. DUG returned −27.9%. A flat −2 times of the daily moves gave −29.8%, so DUG was 1.9 percentage points above that.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.017324
  },
  {
   "id": "q298",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:04:43.568Z",
   "ms": 5048,
   "text": "EDZ aims for **−3 times** the daily move of its underlying, reset daily. This comes from [EDZ](https://etfiq.com/funds/edz), as of Oct 29, 2026.\n\nETFIQ measures it through EEM, an emerging markets ETF. That is the underlying ETFIQ lists for EDZ. The fund's own index is MSCI Emerging Markets.\n\nThe sign is negative. If EEM rises 1% in a day, EDZ aims to fall 3%. If EEM falls 1%, EDZ aims to rise 3%. The multiple resets each day, so returns over longer periods can differ from −3 times the period's move.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.018051
  },
  {
   "id": "q299",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:04:48.616Z",
   "ms": 4319,
   "text": "**SMDD aims for −3 times the daily move of the S&P MidCap 400**, reset daily. ETFIQ measures it through MDY. That is an inverse multiple of three. The sign is negative.\n\nThis comes from the \"Sets out to return\" field on the [SMDD page](https://etfiq.com/funds/smdd), as of Oct 29, 2026.\n\nThe multiple applies to each day's move. Over longer periods, returns can differ from −3 times the total move. Over the three months to Oct 29, 2026, MDY returned −1.3% and the fund returned +5.4%. Three times the inverse of MDY's daily moves gave +1.7%.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.018078
  },
  {
   "id": "q305",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:04:52.935Z",
   "ms": 4524,
   "text": "[TSL](https://etfiq.com/funds/tsl) aims to return **+1.25 times** the daily move of TSLA, reset daily. The sign is positive, so it is long.\n\nOver the window to Oct 29, 2026, a holder actually got +1.24604 times, against the +1.25 stated (ETFIQ, as of 2026-10-29).",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.016654
  },
  {
   "id": "q306",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:04:57.459Z",
   "ms": 4281,
   "text": "[CEFD](https://etfiq.com/funds/cefd) aims to return **+1.5 times** the daily move of the Closed-End Fund Index, reset daily (as of Oct 29, 2026).\n\nThe sign is positive, so it is long and leveraged, not inverse. It is an exchange traded note, which is the issuing bank's unsecured debt.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.013056
  },
  {
   "id": "q308",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:05:01.740Z",
   "ms": 4679,
   "text": "ADBU aims to deliver **+2 times** the daily move of ADBE, reset daily. The sign is positive, so it is a bull fund. Source: [ADBU](https://etfiq.com/funds/adbu), as of Oct 29, 2026.\n\nFor the three months to Oct 29, 2026, ADBU returned −6.7%. Twice ADBE's daily moves gave −4.1%, so the gap was −2.6 percentage points.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.015903
  },
  {
   "id": "q309",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:05:06.419Z",
   "ms": 4986,
   "text": "[AGQ](https://etfiq.com/funds/agq) aims to deliver **+2 times** the daily move of SLV, reset daily. The sign is positive, so it is long and not inverse. The data is as of Oct 29, 2026.\n\nSLV is the underlying fund. Over the three months to Oct 29, 2026, AGQ returned −26.1%. Twice SLV's daily moves gave −25.0%, a gap of −1.1 percentage points.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.016486
  },
  {
   "id": "q333",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:05:11.405Z",
   "ms": 4574,
   "text": "DUSL aims to return **+3 times** the daily move of XLI, reset daily. XLI is the fund the profile names as its underlying. The sign is positive, which makes it a bull fund. Source: [DUSL](https://etfiq.com/funds/dusl), as of Oct 29, 2026.\n\nThe fund fell short of that target over the three months to Oct 29, 2026. It returned −16.2%, against −13.8% for three times XLI's daily moves. That is a gap of −2.4 percentage points.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.017501
  },
  {
   "id": "q334",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:05:15.979Z",
   "ms": 4658,
   "text": "EDC aims for **+3 times** the daily move of its underlying, reset daily. That is a positive multiple, because it is a \"Bull\" fund. ETFIQ's [EDC page](https://etfiq.com/funds/edc) gives the underlying as EEM, an emerging markets ETF, rather than the MSCI index itself. The page states the aim as \"+3 times the daily move of EEM, reset daily\" (as of Oct 29, 2026).\n\nThe multiple applies to each day's move only. Over longer windows, the fund's return can differ from three times the period's move. Over the three months to Oct 29, 2026, EDC returned −9.5%, while three times EEM's daily moves gave −7.0%. That is a gap of −2.5 percentage points.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.018309
  },
  {
   "id": "q341",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:05:20.637Z",
   "ms": 5555,
   "text": "ACWV had net assets of **$3.4bn** on Oct 28, 2026. ETFIQ takes this from the issuer's own daily fund list, as of that date. The number is rounded to $0.1bn, and ETFIQ doesn't publish a more exact one. See the [ACWV fund page](https://etfiq.com/funds/acwv).",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.019923
  },
  {
   "id": "q342",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:05:26.192Z",
   "ms": 4581,
   "text": "APCB's net assets were **$1.0bn** on Aug 31, 2026. ETFIQ takes this from the whole-fund SEC filing (Form N-PORT) for that date. The source is the [APCB fund page](https://etfiq.com/funds/apcb).\n\nETFIQ rounds this to $1.0bn and doesn't publish a more exact number.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.018036
  },
  {
   "id": "q353",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:05:30.773Z",
   "ms": 4622,
   "text": "AAUA had net assets of **$364m** as of Oct 29, 2026. ETFIQ takes that number from the issuer's page. It is rounded to the nearest million, so ETFIQ doesn't publish a more exact dollar amount. Source: [AAUA](https://etfiq.com/funds/aaua).",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.018664
  },
  {
   "id": "q354",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:05:35.395Z",
   "ms": 4562,
   "text": "AXTX had net assets of **$205m** on Oct 29, 2026. That is the issuer's own daily fund list as of that date, as shown on the [AXTX page](https://etfiq.com/funds/axtx). ETFIQ publishes it rounded to the nearest million, so I can't give a more exact total.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.019122
  },
  {
   "id": "q366",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:05:39.957Z",
   "ms": 6932,
   "text": "[CAGE income ETF price: am I ahead of SPY?](https://etfiq.com/funds/cage) \"Since launch in Apr 2026, CAGE paid no cash and returned 16.4% in total, against 10.2% for SPY.\" (as of 2026-10-29)\n\nCAGE's net assets were **$106m** as of Jul 31, 2026. The source is an SEC filing for the whole fund, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. ETFIQ publishes the number rounded to the nearest million dollars.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.020086
  },
  {
   "id": "q367",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:05:46.890Z",
   "ms": 4138,
   "text": "EMAU had net assets of **$1.1m** as of Oct 29, 2026. That comes from the issuer's own daily fund list, as ETFIQ's [EMAU page](https://etfiq.com/funds/emau) reports it.\n\nETFIQ publishes the number only in this rounded form, to one decimal in millions. It gives no exact dollar amount.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.018642
  },
  {
   "id": "q376",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:05:51.028Z",
   "ms": 6165,
   "text": "BIL's net assets were **$48.7bn** as of Oct 28, 2026. The source is the issuer's own daily fund list, as shown on the [BIL fund page](https://etfiq.com/funds/bil). ETFIQ rounds the number to $48.7bn, so I can't give an exact dollar amount.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.019291
  },
  {
   "id": "q377",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:05:57.193Z",
   "ms": 5950,
   "text": "EFG had net assets of **$15.1bn** as of Oct 28, 2026. ETFIQ takes that number from the issuer's own daily fund list. It is rounded to $0.1bn, and ETFIQ doesn't publish a more exact total. Source: [EFG](https://etfiq.com/funds/efg).",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.021727
  },
  {
   "id": "q388",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:06:03.143Z",
   "ms": 5002,
   "text": "COPA's net assets were **$11m** as of Oct 28, 2026. ETFIQ takes that number from the issuer's page, as the [COPA fund page](https://etfiq.com/funds/copa) shows.\n\nETFIQ publishes the number rounded to the nearest million dollars, so I can't give an exact dollar amount.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.021863
  },
  {
   "id": "q389",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:06:08.146Z",
   "ms": 5447,
   "text": "[CTJL](https://etfiq.com/funds/ctjl) had net assets of **$1.3m** on Oct 29, 2026. The source is the issuer's own daily fund list, as of that date.\n\nETFIQ publishes the number only as a rounded $1.3m, so I can't give a more exact dollar amount.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.014809
  },
  {
   "id": "q401",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:06:13.593Z",
   "ms": 5004,
   "text": "The expense ratio for [ARIA Opportunities ETF](https://etfiq.com/funds/aria) is **0.78%**, as of Jul 14, 2026. The source is the 485BPOS XBRL filing dated Jul 14, 2026.\n\nETFIQ lists this as \"Expense ratio\". It doesn't separate a net number from a gross one. I can't confirm that 0.78% is net of any fee waiver.\n\nETFIQ has no archive page for Jul 14, 2026. The 0.78% comes from the fund page, where the number carries that filing date.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.013496
  },
  {
   "id": "q402",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:06:18.597Z",
   "ms": 6203,
   "text": "The expense ratio of [AXTL](https://etfiq.com/funds/axtl) (Leverage Shares 2X Long AXTI Daily ETF) is **0.99%**. ETFIQ's source for it is the 485BPOS XBRL filing dated Jun 9, 2026.\n\nETFIQ lists one expense ratio, and it doesn't say whether the number is net or gross. It also published no archive for Jun 9, 2026, so I couldn't check the number against that date. The 0.99% is the number ETFIQ shows today, with the Jun 9, 2026 filing as its source.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.017191
  },
  {
   "id": "q426",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:06:24.800Z",
   "ms": 5579,
   "text": "[GAA Holdings: Top 10 and Full List, Jul 31, 2026](https://etfiq.com/funds/gaa/holdings/)\n\n\"As of Jul 31, 2026, GAA's top 10 holdings were 57.7% of the fund, led by Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF at 10.42%.\" (as of 2026-07-31)\n\nThat 57.7% is of the fund's net assets, from an SEC filing dated Jul 31, 2026. The filing is 91 days old. GAA held 29 positions in total, and [net assets](https://etfiq.com/funds/gaa) were $73m on that date.\n\nThe ten largest holdings, by weight:\n- EYLD: 10.424%\n- FYLD: 7.274%\n- GVAL: 7.181%\n- BLDG: 6.784%\n- TYLD: 5.026%\n- SYLD: 4.481%\n- QMOM: 4.142%\n- VAMO: 4.142%\n- SDCI: 4.12%\n- BNDX: 4.085%",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.015824
  },
  {
   "id": "q431",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:06:30.379Z",
   "ms": 5688,
   "text": "[BIL Holdings: Top 10 and Full List, Oct 28, 2026](https://etfiq.com/funds/bil/holdings/): \"As of Oct 28, 2026, BIL's top 10 holdings were 67.8% of the fund, led by Treasury Bill 12/26 0.00000 at 8.44%.\" (as of 2026-10-28)\n\nSome context from the [BIL](https://etfiq.com/funds/bil) holdings data, from the issuer's daily file as of Oct 28, 2026:\n- The fund held 26 positions in total.\n- All ten of the largest are Treasury bills. Seven mature in December 2026 and three in January 2027.\n- Weights run from 8.436% down to 5.336%.\n- The 67.8% is a share of the fund's weight, as the issuer's file reports it.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.015008
  },
  {
   "id": "q436",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:06:36.067Z",
   "ms": 7193,
   "text": "ETFIQ does not publish a single top-ten total for ARKD, and I can't add one from numbers it didn't give. It does publish each holding's weight, so here are the ten largest from the SEC filing as of Jun 30, 2025, listed on the [ARKD page](https://etfiq.com/funds/arkd). The fund held 12 positions in all.\n\n| Holding | Weight |\n|---|---|\n| ARK 21Shares Active Bitcoin Futures Strategy ETF (ARKA) | 27.041% |\n| Coinbase Global (COIN) | 19.298% |\n| ARK 21Shares Active Ethereum Futures Strategy ETF (ARKZ) | 13.661% |\n| Shopify (SHOP) | 8.656% |\n| Block (XYZ) | 7.633% |\n| Robinhood Markets (HOOD) | 5.948% |\n| Galaxy Digital (GLXY CN) | 5.005% |\n| MercadoLibre (MELI) | 4.002% |\n| PayPal Holdings (PYPL) | 3.17% |\n| NU Holdings (NU) | 2.668% |\n\nThese weights are each holding's share of the fund, as ETFIQ read them from the filing. ETFIQ's data does not label them as a share of net assets.\n\nThis book is 487 days old. It comes from an SEC filing, and ETFIQ has not read a more recent one.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.017787
  },
  {
   "id": "q437",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:06:43.260Z",
   "ms": 4574,
   "text": "[CMDT Holdings: Top 10, 259 Positions, Jun 30, 2026](https://etfiq.com/funds/cmdt/holdings/)\n\n\"As of Jun 30, 2026, CMDT's top 10 holdings were 16.1% of the fund, led by PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund at 5.91%.\" (as of 2026-06-30)\n\nThat 16.1% is a share of the fund's net assets, from an SEC filing. The filing is 122 days old.\n\nThe largest holding is a PIMCO short-maturity ETF at 5.91%. The other nine each weigh between 0.90% and 1.45%. They include Rogers Communications, Letra Tesouro Nacional, Bank of Montreal and TransCanada Pipelines. The fund has 259 positions in all. See [CMDT](https://etfiq.com/funds/cmdt).",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.015543
  },
  {
   "id": "q442",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:06:47.834Z",
   "ms": 5571,
   "text": "[FDND Holdings: Top 10 and Full List, Oct 28, 2026](https://etfiq.com/funds/fdnd/holdings/)\n\n\"As of Oct 28, 2026, FDND’s top 10 holdings were 61.1% of the fund, led by Amazon.com, Inc. at 10.27%.\"\n\nThe weights come from the issuer's daily file dated Oct 28, 2026. The fund holds 42 positions in total. The top ten, as a percentage of the fund:\n\n- Amazon.com: 10.27%\n- Meta Platforms (Class A): 9.54%\n- Cisco Systems: 8.93%\n- Alphabet (Class A): 5.54%\n- Netflix: 5.22%\n- Salesforce: 4.54%\n- Alphabet (Class C): 4.45%\n- Arista Networks: 4.43%\n- Oracle: 4.10%\n- Snowflake (Class A): 4.09%\n\nSource: [FDND](https://etfiq.com/funds/fdnd).",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.015782
  },
  {
   "id": "q447",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:06:53.405Z",
   "ms": 6036,
   "text": "[DSI Holdings: Top 10, 402 Positions, Oct 28, 2026](https://etfiq.com/funds/dsi/holdings/)\n\n\"As of Oct 28, 2026, DSI's top 10 holdings were 45.1% of the fund, led by Nvidia at 13.70%.\" (as of 2026-10-28)\n\nThe weights come from the issuer's daily file, dated Oct 28, 2026 (2 days old). They are shares of the fund's holdings, which ETFIQ reports as a share of the fund. The ten are:\n\n- Nvidia: 13.70%\n- Microsoft: 10.37%\n- Alphabet Class A: 5.27%\n- Alphabet Class C: 4.16%\n- Tesla: 3.20%\n- Advanced Micro Devices: 2.61%\n- Visa Class A: 1.84%\n- AbbVie: 1.40%\n- Mastercard Class A: 1.37%\n- Cisco Systems: 1.20%\n\nThe fund holds 402 positions in total. Its net assets were $5.5bn on Oct 28, 2026, per its [fund page](https://etfiq.com/funds/dsi).",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.016176
  },
  {
   "id": "q448",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:06:59.441Z",
   "ms": 6128,
   "text": "[EEM Holdings: Top 10, 1,190 Positions, Oct 28, 2026](https://etfiq.com/funds/eem/holdings/)\n\n\"As of Oct 28, 2026, EEM’s top 10 holdings were 38.0% of the fund, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing at 15.88%.\"\n\nThe weights come from the issuer's daily holdings file, dated Oct 28, 2026 (2 days old). The ten largest holdings, as a share of the fund:\n\n- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing: 15.88%\n- Samsung Electronics: 7.29%\n- SK Hynix: 5.29%\n- Tencent Holdings: 2.61%\n- Alibaba Group Holding: 1.82%\n- MediaTek: 1.62%\n- Samsung Electronics non-voting preferred: 0.98%\n- China Construction Bank H shares: 0.92%\n- Hon Hai Precision Industry: 0.82%\n- Delta Electronics: 0.80%\n\nNet assets were $29.6bn on Oct 28, 2026, per the [EEM fund page](https://etfiq.com/funds/eem).",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.016371
  },
  {
   "id": "q456",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:07:05.569Z",
   "ms": 5499,
   "text": "[HYDR Holdings: Top 10 and Full List, Aug 31, 2026](https://etfiq.com/funds/hydr/holdings/)\n\n\"As of Aug 31, 2026, HYDR's top 10 holdings were 70.4% of the fund, led by Bloom Energy Corp at 13.69%.\" (as of 2026-08-31)\n\nThe number comes from an SEC filing. It is 60 days old, and the fund has 25 holdings in all. The weights are shares of the fund as that filing reports them. The top five are:\n\n- Bloom Energy: 13.685%\n- Doosan Fuel Cell: 10.727%\n- Plug Power: 10.361%\n- Ceres Power: 7.462%\n- SFC Energy: 6.807%\n\nSource: [HYDR](https://etfiq.com/funds/hydr)",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.015258
  },
  {
   "id": "q461",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:07:11.068Z",
   "ms": 5552,
   "text": "[FNOV](https://etfiq.com/funds/fnov) had a net **inflow of $7,599,250** over the window from 2026-10-22 to 2026-10-28 (as of 2026-10-28).\n\n- That is 0.6% of net assets at the window's start. Those assets were $1,267,608,786 on 2026-10-21.\n- All 5 of the 5 trading days were counted. Two days had inflows and none had outflows.\n- The latest day, 2026-10-28, was an inflow of $1,519,250.\n\nETFIQ computes these flows from the daily change in shares outstanding times NAV. This is an estimate, not a filed number.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.01157
  },
  {
   "id": "q462",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:07:16.620Z",
   "ms": 5985,
   "text": "HIMU had a net **inflow of $48,140,566** in ETFIQ's 1W window. The window ran from 2026-10-22 to 2026-10-23, as of 2026-10-23. Source: [HIMU](https://etfiq.com/funds/himu).\n\n- The window counted only 2 days, both inflow days. ETFIQ's 1W window for this fund therefore covers just those two days and not a full Monday to Friday week.\n- The inflow was 1.83% of net assets at the window's start. Those assets were $2,635,625,200 on 2026-10-21.\n- The fund has had inflows on 3 straight days, 2026-10-21 to 2026-10-23, totaling $54,599,197.\n\nDaily flows are the change in shares outstanding times NAV.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.012266
  },
  {
   "id": "q471",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:07:22.605Z",
   "ms": 5528,
   "text": "[AMZD](https://etfiq.com/funds/amzd) had a net **inflow of $627,750** over the week from 2026-10-22 to 2026-10-28 (as of 2026-10-28).\n\n- The window covers 5 of 5 days. Two days had inflows and one had outflows.\n- The flow is the change in shares outstanding times NAV.\n- On 2026-10-28 alone, the net flow was $0.\n- ETFIQ gives no percentage of net assets for this week.\n\nSource: [ETFIQ flows method](https://etfiq.com/methodology/flows).",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.011075
  },
  {
   "id": "q472",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:07:28.134Z",
   "ms": 5231,
   "text": "**AXTL had a net inflow of $624,400** over the week from 2026-10-22 to 2026-10-28 (5 of 5 days counted). The data is as of 2026-10-28, from [AXTL](https://etfiq.com/funds/axtl).\n\n- That is 8.48% of net assets at the window's start. Those assets were $7,362,000 on 2026-10-21.\n- Three days had inflows and none had outflows.\n- The last day, 2026-10-28, had a flow of $0.\n\nETFIQ computes the flow as the daily change in shares outstanding times NAV.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.010583
  },
  {
   "id": "q481",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:07:33.365Z",
   "ms": 5010,
   "text": "[BSCQ price: Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate…](https://etfiq.com/funds/bscq): \"BSCQ returned +4.0% over the year to Oct 29, 2026, charges 0.10% a year and holds $3.0bn in net assets on Oct 28, 2026.\"\n\n**BSCQ had a net outflow of $52,693,086 over the latest week.** The window runs Oct 22 to Oct 27, 2026, as of Oct 27, 2026.\n\n- That is -1.73% of its net assets at the window's start ($3,038,008,809 on Oct 21, 2026).\n- All 4 trading days in the window were counted, and all 4 were outflow days.\n- The outflow streak is 7 days, from Oct 19 to Oct 27, 2026, totalling -$181,601,267.\n\nETFIQ computes daily flows as the change in shares outstanding times NAV. Details are on the [flows methodology page](https://etfiq.com/methodology/flows).",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.017078
  },
  {
   "id": "q482",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:07:38.375Z",
   "ms": 5215,
   "text": "[BSCS](https://etfiq.com/funds/bscs) had a net outflow of **$12,088,521** over the 1W window, from 2026-10-22 to 2026-10-27 (as of 2026-10-27).\n\n- That is -0.34% of net assets. Net assets at the window's start were $3,527,205,271 (as of 2026-10-21).\n- ETFIQ counted 4 of 4 days in the window. One day was an inflow and one was an outflow.\n- The last day, 2026-10-27, was an outflow of $15,112,439.\n\nETFIQ computes daily flows as the change in shares outstanding times NAV. Method: [flows](https://etfiq.com/methodology/flows).",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.011223
  },
  {
   "id": "q491",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:07:43.590Z",
   "ms": 5023,
   "text": "[ASMG](https://etfiq.com/funds/asmg) had a net outflow of **$1,229,950** over the week from 2026-10-22 to 2026-10-28 (as of 2026-10-28).\n\n- That is 4.8% of the fund's net assets at the start of the window. Those assets were $25,601,700 on 2026-10-21.\n- All 5 of the 5 trading days in the window were counted. Two of them were outflow days and none were inflow days.\n- ETFIQ computes daily flow as the change in shares outstanding times NAV. The [flows methodology](https://etfiq.com/methodology/flows) explains this.",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.010887
  },
  {
   "id": "q492",
   "at": "2026-10-30T14:07:48.613Z",
   "ms": 5150,
   "text": "[BDRY: Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF price](https://etfiq.com/funds/bdry): \"BDRY returned +52.1% over the year to Oct 29, 2026, charges 4.12% a year and holds $26m in net assets on Oct 28, 2026.\"\n\n**Net flow: an outflow of $315,750** over the week from Oct 22 to Oct 28, 2026 (ETFIQ, as of Oct 28, 2026).\n\n- That is −1.14% of net assets. Net assets were $27,727,085 at the window's start on Oct 21, 2026.\n- Only 4 of the 5 days in the window were counted, so the week is incomplete.\n- Of the days counted, 1 was an outflow day and none were inflow days.\n- The Oct 28 day itself shows $0.\n\nETFIQ computes daily flows as the change in shares outstanding times NAV. See [BDRY's flows data](https://etfiq.com/data/flows/funds/bdry.json).",
   "error": null,
   "cost_usd": 0.016852
  }
 ]
}