{"url":"https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/rom-vs-tecs","section":"compare","title":"ROM vs TECS: which held to its multiple? | ETFIQ","description":"ROM sets out to return +2 times XLK each day and TECS -3 times. Over the three months to Sep 30, 2026 they finished \u22123.2 pts and \u22124.3 pts away.","as_of":"Sep 30, 2026","structured_data":[{"@type":"FAQPage","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"Which came closer to its stated multiple, ROM or TECS?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, ROM finished 3.2 points from what its multiple implies and TECS finished 4.3 points from its own, so ROM came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Are ROM and TECS levered on the same thing?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Yes. Both are levered on technology, ROM at +2 times and TECS at -3 times the daily move."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Which one decays faster, ROM or TECS?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window ROM\u2019s moved at 26% annualized and TECS\u2019s at 26%, so ROM has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Can I hold ROM or TECS for a year?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year\u2019s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Which is cheaper, ROM or TECS?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"ROM charges 0.93% a year and TECS charges 1.01%, so ROM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus."}}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"ETFIQ","item":"https://etfiq.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Leveraged ETFs","item":"https://etfiq.com/leverage/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ROM vs TECS","item":"https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/rom-vs-tecs"}]},{"@type":"WebPage","name":"ROM vs TECS: which held to its multiple?","description":"ROM sets out to return +2 times XLK each day and TECS -3 times. Over the three months to Sep 30, 2026 they finished \u22123.2 pts and \u22124.3 pts away.","url":"https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/rom-vs-tecs","dateModified":"2026-09-30","abstract":"Over three months against its own daily promise, ROM finished 1.6 points short and TECS 2.8 points over.","publisher":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#org"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#website"},"speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".verdict",".faq"]}},{"@type":"Dataset","name":"ETFIQ comparison of ROM and TECS","description":"ROM sets out to return +2 times XLK each day and TECS -3 times. Over the three months to Sep 30, 2026 they finished \u22123.2 pts and \u22124.3 pts away.","dateModified":"2026-09-30","creator":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#org"},"isAccessibleForFree":true,"url":"https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/rom-vs-tecs","license":"https://etfiq.com/standards/","publisher":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#org"},"inLanguage":"en","creativeWorkStatus":"Published","distribution":[{"@type":"DataDownload","encodingFormat":"application/json","contentUrl":"https://etfiq.com/data/leverage.json"}],"variableMeasured":["Stated multiple","Underlying return","What the stated multiple implies","Fund total return","Difference against the label","Volatility of the underlying","Expense ratio"],"keywords":["exchange-traded funds","ETF","Leveraged ETFs","fund data","SEC filings"]}],"characters":7150,"truncated":true,"content":"ETFIQ / Leveraged ETFs / Head to head / ROM vs TECS \n ETFIQ etfiq.com \u00b7 independent ETF data \n\n Data as of Sep 30, 2026 .\n\n ROM vs TECS: which held to its multiple?\n\n Over three months against its own daily promise, ROM finished 1.6 points short and TECS 2.8 points over.\n Copy this for sharing \n \n ProShares Ultra Technology and Direxion Daily Technology Bear 3X ETF.\n\n Download as PDF \n\n +8.0% ROM returned, 3 months \n \u221221.0% TECS returned, 3 months \n \u22123.2 pts ROM from its stated multiple \n \u22124.3 pts TECS from its stated multiple \n\n ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: ROM scores higher\n Did it keep up ","source":"ETFIQ, independent ETF data. Recomputed nightly from public filings and prices.","publisher":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#org","name":"ETFIQ","url":"https://etfiq.com"},"license":"https://etfiq.com/license/","citation":"ETFIQ, as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/rom-vs-tecs","a":{"ticker":"ROM","name":"ProShares Ultra Technology","issuer":"ProShares","desk":"leverage","as_of":"2026-09-30","verdict":"Three months to Sep 30, 2026: ROM returned +8.0% where its own daily promise gave +9.6%, 1.6 points short.","url":"https://etfiq.com/funds/rom","key_facts":[{"label":"What XLK did","value":"+5.6%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"What 2 times a day gives","value":"+9.6%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"What the fund returned","value":"+8.0%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"The fund itself cost","value":"\u22121.6 pts","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"Net assets","value":"$1.4bn","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":"issuer page, as of Sep 30, 2026"},{"label":"Expense ratio","value":"0.93%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":"485BPOS XBRL, Sep 25, 2026"}]},"b":{"ticker":"TECS","name":"Direxion Daily Technology Bear 3X ETF","issuer":"Direxion","desk":"leverage","as_of":"2026-09-30","verdict":"Three months to Sep 30, 2026: TECS returned \u221221.0% where its own daily promise gave \u221223.8%, 2.8 points over.","url":"https://etfiq.com/funds/tecs","key_facts":[{"label":"What XLK did","value":"+5.6%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"What \u22123 times a day gives","value":"\u221223.8%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"What the fund returned","value":"\u221221.0%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"The fund itself added","value":"+2.8 pts","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"Net assets","value":"$69m","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":"issuer page, as of Sep 30, 2026"},{"label":"Expense ratio","value":"1.01%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":"485BPOS XBRL, Feb 26, 2026"}]},"overlap_pct":null,"overlap_note":"ETFIQ does not publish a holdings overlap for this pair. Either the funds are not compared on holdings, or one book is incomplete.","full_text_at":"https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/rom-vs-tecs"}