{"url":"https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julh-vs-sca","section":"compare","title":"JULH vs SCA: which paid, and which earned it? | ETFIQ","description":"JULH paid 4.8% of its price in cash each over its own window and SCA 12.8%. Total return with distributions reinvested was +4.5% against +17.8%, to Sep 30","as_of":"Sep 30, 2026","structured_data":[{"@type":"FAQPage","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"Which is cheaper, JULH or SCA?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"JULH charges 0.79% a year and SCA charges 1.07%, so JULH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus."}}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"ETFIQ","item":"https://etfiq.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Income ETFs","item":"https://etfiq.com/income/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"JULH vs SCA","item":"https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julh-vs-sca"}]},{"@type":"WebPage","name":"JULH vs SCA: which paid, and which earned it?","description":"JULH paid 4.8% of its price in cash each over its own window and SCA 12.8%. Total return with distributions reinvested was +4.5% against +17.8%, to Sep 30, 2026.","url":"https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julh-vs-sca","dateModified":"2026-09-30","abstract":"JULH and SCA both write options for income.","publisher":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#org"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#website"},"speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".verdict",".faq"]}},{"@type":"Dataset","name":"ETFIQ comparison of JULH and SCA","description":"JULH paid 4.8% of its price in cash each over its own window and SCA 12.8%. Total return with distributions reinvested was +4.5% against +17.8%, to Sep 30, 2026.","dateModified":"2026-09-30","creator":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#org"},"isAccessibleForFree":true,"url":"https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julh-vs-sca","license":"https://etfiq.com/standards/","publisher":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#org"},"inLanguage":"en","creativeWorkStatus":"Published","distribution":[{"@type":"DataDownload","encodingFormat":"application/json","contentUrl":"https://etfiq.com/data/income.json"}],"variableMeasured":["Cash paid","Price change","Total return with distributions reinvested","Benchmark total return","Ahead or behind in percentage points","Distribution rate","Return of capital estimate","Expense ratio"],"keywords":["exchange-traded funds","ETF","Income ETFs","fund data","SEC filings"]}],"characters":4785,"truncated":true,"content":"ETFIQ / Income ETFs / Head to head / JULH vs SCA \n ETFIQ etfiq.com \u00b7 independent ETF data \n\n Data as of Sep 30, 2026 .\n\n JULH vs SCA: which paid, and which earned it?\n\n JULH and SCA both write options for income.\n Copy this for sharing \n \n Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July and GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF.\n\n Download as PDF \n\n 4.8% JULH cash paid, 1 year \n 12.8% SCA cash paid, since launch \n +4.5% JULH total return, 1 year \n +17.8% SCA total return, since launch \n\n JULH 11.2 pts behind SPY \u00b7 1 year to Sep 30, 2026 [JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price \u22120.4%, total +4.5%, SPY ","source":"ETFIQ, independent ETF data. Recomputed nightly from public filings and prices.","publisher":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#org","name":"ETFIQ","url":"https://etfiq.com"},"license":"https://etfiq.com/license/","citation":"ETFIQ, as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julh-vs-sca","a":{"ticker":"JULH","name":"Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July","issuer":"Innovator","desk":"income","as_of":"2026-09-30","verdict":"Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, JULH paid 4.8% in cash and finished 11.2 points behind SPY.","url":"https://etfiq.com/funds/julh","key_facts":[{"label":"Cash paid, 1 year, on its starting price","value":"4.8%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"Total return, 1 year","value":"+4.5%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"Against SPY","value":"\u221211.2 pts","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"Latest payout, annualized","value":"6.6%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"Net assets","value":"$17m","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":"issuer page, as of Sep 30, 2026"},{"label":"Expense ratio","value":"0.79%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":"485BPOS XBRL, Feb 27, 2026"}]},"b":{"ticker":"SCA","name":"GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF","issuer":"GraniteShares","desk":"income","as_of":"2026-09-30","verdict":"Since its launch on May 27, 2026, SCA paid 12.8% in cash and finished 10.3 points ahead of SMCI.","url":"https://etfiq.com/funds/sca","key_facts":[{"label":"Cash paid, since launch, on its starting price","value":"12.8%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"Total return, since launch","value":"+17.8%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"Against SMCI","value":"+10.3 pts","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"Return of capital, latest payout (GraniteShares estimate)","value":"28.6%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":"GraniteShares estimate"},{"label":"Net assets","value":"$2m","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":"issuer page, as of Sep 30, 2026"},{"label":"Expense ratio","value":"1.07%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":"485BPOS XBRL, Jan 13, 2026"}]},"overlap_pct":null,"overlap_note":"ETFIQ does not publish a holdings overlap for this pair. Either the funds are not compared on holdings, or one book is incomplete.","full_text_at":"https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julh-vs-sca"}