{"url":"https://etfiq.com/compare/income/iacl-vs-sca","section":"compare","title":"IACL vs SCA: which paid, and which earned it? | ETFIQ","description":"IACL paid 0.4% of its price in cash each over its own window and SCA 12.8%. Total return with distributions reinvested was +1.1% against +17.8%, to Sep 30","as_of":"Sep 30, 2026","structured_data":[{"@type":"FAQPage","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"Which is cheaper, IACL or SCA?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"IACL charges 0.55% a year and SCA charges 1.07%, so IACL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus."}}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"ETFIQ","item":"https://etfiq.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Income ETFs","item":"https://etfiq.com/income/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"IACL vs SCA","item":"https://etfiq.com/compare/income/iacl-vs-sca"}]},{"@type":"WebPage","name":"IACL vs SCA: which paid, and which earned it?","description":"IACL paid 0.4% of its price in cash each over its own window and SCA 12.8%. Total return with distributions reinvested was +1.1% against +17.8%, to Sep 30, 2026.","url":"https://etfiq.com/compare/income/iacl-vs-sca","dateModified":"2026-09-30","abstract":"IACL and SCA both write options for income.","publisher":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#org"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#website"},"speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".verdict",".faq"]}},{"@type":"Dataset","name":"ETFIQ comparison of IACL and SCA","description":"IACL paid 0.4% of its price in cash each over its own window and SCA 12.8%. Total return with distributions reinvested was +1.1% against +17.8%, to Sep 30, 2026.","dateModified":"2026-09-30","creator":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#org"},"isAccessibleForFree":true,"url":"https://etfiq.com/compare/income/iacl-vs-sca","license":"https://etfiq.com/standards/","publisher":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#org"},"inLanguage":"en","creativeWorkStatus":"Published","distribution":[{"@type":"DataDownload","encodingFormat":"application/json","contentUrl":"https://etfiq.com/data/income.json"}],"variableMeasured":["Cash paid","Price change","Total return with distributions reinvested","Benchmark total return","Ahead or behind in percentage points","Distribution rate","Return of capital estimate","Expense ratio"],"keywords":["exchange-traded funds","ETF","Income ETFs","fund data","SEC filings"]}],"characters":4909,"truncated":true,"content":"ETFIQ / Income ETFs / Head to head / IACL vs SCA \n ETFIQ etfiq.com \u00b7 independent ETF data \n\n Data as of Sep 30, 2026 .\n\n IACL vs SCA: which paid, and which earned it?\n\n IACL and SCA both write options for income.\n Copy this for sharing \n \n GraniteShares US 100 Autocallable Income ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF.\n\n Download as PDF \n\n 0.4% IACL cash paid, since launch \n 12.8% SCA cash paid, since launch \n +1.1% IACL total return, since launch \n +17.8% SCA total return, since launch \n\n IACL 1.4 pts ahead of SPY \u00b7 since launch to Sep 30, 2026 [IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%,","source":"ETFIQ, independent ETF data. Recomputed nightly from public filings and prices.","publisher":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#org","name":"ETFIQ","url":"https://etfiq.com"},"license":"https://etfiq.com/license/","citation":"ETFIQ, as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/iacl-vs-sca","a":{"ticker":"IACL","name":"GraniteShares US 100 Autocallable Income ETF","issuer":"GraniteShares","desk":"income","as_of":"2026-09-30","verdict":"Since its launch on Aug 18, 2026, IACL paid 0.4% in cash and finished 1.4 points ahead of SPY.","url":"https://etfiq.com/funds/iacl","key_facts":[{"label":"Cash paid, since launch, on its starting price","value":"0.4%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"Total return, since launch","value":"+1.1%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"Against SPY","value":"+1.4 pts","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"Return of capital, latest payout (GraniteShares estimate)","value":"99.0%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":"GraniteShares estimate"},{"label":"Net assets","value":"$3m","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":"issuer page, as of Sep 30, 2026"},{"label":"Expense ratio","value":"0.55%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":"485BPOS XBRL, Aug 10, 2026"}]},"b":{"ticker":"SCA","name":"GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF","issuer":"GraniteShares","desk":"income","as_of":"2026-09-30","verdict":"Since its launch on May 27, 2026, SCA paid 12.8% in cash and finished 10.3 points ahead of SMCI.","url":"https://etfiq.com/funds/sca","key_facts":[{"label":"Cash paid, since launch, on its starting price","value":"12.8%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"Total return, since launch","value":"+17.8%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"Against SMCI","value":"+10.3 pts","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"Return of capital, latest payout (GraniteShares estimate)","value":"28.6%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":"GraniteShares estimate"},{"label":"Net assets","value":"$2m","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":"issuer page, as of Sep 30, 2026"},{"label":"Expense ratio","value":"1.07%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":"485BPOS XBRL, Jan 13, 2026"}]},"overlap_pct":null,"overlap_note":"ETFIQ does not publish a holdings overlap for this pair. Either the funds are not compared on holdings, or one book is incomplete.","full_text_at":"https://etfiq.com/compare/income/iacl-vs-sca"}