{"url":"https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-sclz","section":"compare","title":"ACSP vs SCLZ: Dividend Yield & Total Return | ETFIQ","description":"ACSP paid 10.4% in cash each over its own window and SCLZ 8.5%. Total return with distributions reinvested was \u22126.8% against +10.6%, to Nov 4, 2026.","as_of":"Nov 4, 2026","structured_data":[{"@type":"FAQPage","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"Which is cheaper, ACSP or SCLZ?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"ACSP charges 0.72% a year and SCLZ charges 0.79%, so ACSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus."}}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"ETFIQ","item":"https://etfiq.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Income ETFs","item":"https://etfiq.com/income/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Compare ETFs","item":"https://etfiq.com/compare/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"ACSP vs SCLZ","item":"https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-sclz"}]},{"@type":"WebPage","name":"ACSP vs SCLZ: Dividend Yield & Total Return","description":"ACSP paid 10.4% in cash each over its own window and SCLZ 8.5%. Total return with distributions reinvested was \u22126.8% against +10.6%, to Nov 4, 2026.","url":"https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-sclz","dateModified":"2026-11-04","abstract":"ACSP and SCLZ both write options for income.","publisher":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#org"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#website"},"speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".verdict",".faq"]}},{"@type":"Dataset","name":"ETFIQ comparison of ACSP and SCLZ","description":"ACSP paid 10.4% in cash each over its own window and SCLZ 8.5%. Total return with distributions reinvested was \u22126.8% against +10.6%, to Nov 4, 2026.","dateModified":"2026-11-04","creator":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#org"},"isAccessibleForFree":true,"url":"https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-sclz","license":"https://etfiq.com/license/","publisher":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#org"},"inLanguage":"en","creativeWorkStatus":"Published","distribution":[{"@type":"DataDownload","encodingFormat":"application/json","contentUrl":"https://etfiq.com/data/income.json"}],"variableMeasured":["Cash paid","Price change","Total return with distributions reinvested","Benchmark total return","Ahead or behind in percentage points","Distribution rate","Return of capital estimate","Expense ratio"],"keywords":["exchange-traded funds","ETF","Income ETFs","fund data","SEC filings"]}],"characters":6209,"truncated":true,"content":"ETFIQ / Income ETFs / Compare ETFs / ACSP vs SCLZ \n ETFIQ etfiq.com \u00b7 independent ETF data \n\n Data as of Nov 4, 2026 .\n\n ACSP vs SCLZ: Dividend Yield & Total Return\n\n ACSP and SCLZ both write options for income.\n Copy this for sharing \n \n ACSP costs 0.07 points a year less.\n ACSP and SCLZ at a glance. As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. ACSP SCLZ \n Expense ratio 0.72% 0.79% \n Net assets, ACSP as of Nov 4, 2026 and SCLZ as of Jun 30, 2026 $57m $20m \n Total return, 1 year not published +10.6% \n Benchmark S&P 500, measured through SPY S&P 500, measured through SPY \n Holdings in common 0% \n Holdings","source":"ETFIQ, independent ETF data. Recomputed nightly from public filings and prices.","publisher":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#org","name":"ETFIQ","url":"https://etfiq.com"},"license":"https://etfiq.com/license/","license_text":"Data ETFIQ computes is free to use with attribution: ETFIQ (etfiq.com). Issuer data stays under its owner's terms.","citation":"ETFIQ, ACSP against SCLZ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-sclz","a":{"ticker":"ACSP","name":"ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF","issuer":"ProShares","desk":"income","as_of":"2026-11-04","verdict":"Since launch in Aug 2026, ACSP paid 10.4% in cash and lost 6.8% in total, against \u22121.0% for SPY.","url":"https://etfiq.com/funds/acsp","key_facts":[{"label":"Cash paid, since launch, on its starting price","value":"10.4%","as_of":"2026-11-04","source":"computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and distributions"},{"label":"Total return, since launch","value":"\u22126.8%","as_of":"2026-11-04","source":"computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices"},{"label":"Against SPY","value":"\u22125.8 pts","as_of":"2026-11-04","source":"computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices"},{"label":"Return of capital, latest payout (ProShares estimate)","value":"98.0%","as_of":"2026-11-04","source":"ProShares estimate"},{"label":"Last payment, ex-date Nov 2, 2026","value":"$0.302","as_of":"2026-11-02","source":"Tiingo end-of-day distributions"},{"label":"Net assets","value":"$57m","as_of":"2026-11-04","source":"issuer page, as of Nov 4, 2026"},{"label":"Expense ratio","value":"0.72%","as_of":"2026-07-23","source":"485BPOS XBRL, Jul 23, 2026"}]},"b":{"ticker":"SCLZ","name":"Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF","issuer":"Swan","desk":"income","as_of":"2026-11-04","verdict":"Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.5% in cash and returned 10.6% in total, against 14.8% for SPY.","url":"https://etfiq.com/funds/sclz","key_facts":[{"label":"Cash paid, 1 year, on its starting price","value":"8.5%","as_of":"2026-11-04","source":"computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and distributions"},{"label":"Total return, 1 year","value":"+10.6%","as_of":"2026-11-04","source":"computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices"},{"label":"Against SPY","value":"\u22124.2 pts","as_of":"2026-11-04","source":"computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices"},{"label":"Latest payout, annualized on today\u2019s price","value":"8.7%","as_of":"2026-11-04","source":"computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and distributions"},{"label":"Last payment (paid monthly), ex-date Oct 22, 2026","value":"$0.4036","as_of":"2026-10-22","source":"Tiingo end-of-day distributions"},{"label":"Net assets","value":"$20m","as_of":"2026-06-30","source":"SEC filing, whole fund, as filed for Jun 30, 2026"},{"label":"Expense ratio","value":"0.79%","as_of":"2026-10-28","source":"485BPOS XBRL, Oct 28, 2026"}]},"overlap_pct":0,"full_text_at":"https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-sclz"}