{"url":"https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-sca","section":"compare","title":"ACBE vs SCA: which paid, and which earned it? | ETFIQ","description":"ACBE paid 0.6% of its price in cash each over its own window and SCA 12.8%. Total return with distributions reinvested was +0.7% against +17.8%, to Sep 30","as_of":"Sep 30, 2026","structured_data":[{"@type":"FAQPage","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"Which is cheaper, ACBE or SCA?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"ACBE charges 0.60% a year and SCA charges 1.07%, so ACBE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus."}}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"ETFIQ","item":"https://etfiq.com/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Income ETFs","item":"https://etfiq.com/income/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"ACBE vs SCA","item":"https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-sca"}]},{"@type":"WebPage","name":"ACBE vs SCA: which paid, and which earned it?","description":"ACBE paid 0.6% of its price in cash each over its own window and SCA 12.8%. Total return with distributions reinvested was +0.7% against +17.8%, to Sep 30, 2026.","url":"https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-sca","dateModified":"2026-09-30","abstract":"ACBE and SCA both write options for income.","publisher":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#org"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#website"},"speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".verdict",".faq"]}},{"@type":"Dataset","name":"ETFIQ comparison of ACBE and SCA","description":"ACBE paid 0.6% of its price in cash each over its own window and SCA 12.8%. Total return with distributions reinvested was +0.7% against +17.8%, to Sep 30, 2026.","dateModified":"2026-09-30","creator":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#org"},"isAccessibleForFree":true,"url":"https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-sca","license":"https://etfiq.com/standards/","publisher":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#org"},"inLanguage":"en","creativeWorkStatus":"Published","distribution":[{"@type":"DataDownload","encodingFormat":"application/json","contentUrl":"https://etfiq.com/data/income.json"}],"variableMeasured":["Cash paid","Price change","Total return with distributions reinvested","Benchmark total return","Ahead or behind in percentage points","Distribution rate","Return of capital estimate","Expense ratio"],"keywords":["exchange-traded funds","ETF","Income ETFs","fund data","SEC filings"]}],"characters":4714,"truncated":true,"content":"ETFIQ / Income ETFs / Head to head / ACBE vs SCA \n ETFIQ etfiq.com \u00b7 independent ETF data \n\n Data as of Sep 30, 2026 .\n\n ACBE vs SCA: which paid, and which earned it?\n\n ACBE and SCA both write options for income.\n Copy this for sharing \n \n Pacer Metaurus Enhanced Core Income Autocallable ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF.\n\n Download as PDF \n\n 0.6% ACBE cash paid, since launch \n 12.8% SCA cash paid, since launch \n +0.7% ACBE total return, since launch \n +17.8% SCA total return, since launch \n\n ACBE About even with SPY \u00b7 since launch to Sep 30, 2026 [ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price","source":"ETFIQ, independent ETF data. Recomputed nightly from public filings and prices.","publisher":{"@id":"https://etfiq.com/#org","name":"ETFIQ","url":"https://etfiq.com"},"license":"https://etfiq.com/license/","citation":"ETFIQ, as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-sca","a":{"ticker":"ACBE","name":"Pacer Metaurus Enhanced Core Income Autocallable ETF","issuer":"Pacer","desk":"income","as_of":"2026-09-30","verdict":"Since its launch on Sep 10, 2026, ACBE paid 0.6% in cash and finished level with SPY.","url":"https://etfiq.com/funds/acbe","key_facts":[{"label":"Cash paid, since launch, on its starting price","value":"0.6%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"Total return, since launch","value":"+0.7%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"Against SPY","value":"\u22120.2 pts","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"Latest payout, annualized","value":"6.9%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"Net assets","value":"$3m","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":"the issuer\u2019s own daily fund list, as of Sep 18, 2026"},{"label":"Expense ratio","value":"0.60%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":"485BPOS XBRL, Aug 24, 2026"}]},"b":{"ticker":"SCA","name":"GraniteShares Autocallable SMCI ETF","issuer":"GraniteShares","desk":"income","as_of":"2026-09-30","verdict":"Since its launch on May 27, 2026, SCA paid 12.8% in cash and finished 10.3 points ahead of SMCI.","url":"https://etfiq.com/funds/sca","key_facts":[{"label":"Cash paid, since launch, on its starting price","value":"12.8%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"Total return, since launch","value":"+17.8%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"Against SMCI","value":"+10.3 pts","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":null},{"label":"Return of capital, latest payout (GraniteShares estimate)","value":"28.6%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":"GraniteShares estimate"},{"label":"Net assets","value":"$2m","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":"issuer page, as of Sep 30, 2026"},{"label":"Expense ratio","value":"1.07%","as_of":"2026-09-30","source":"485BPOS XBRL, Jan 13, 2026"}]},"overlap_pct":null,"overlap_note":"ETFIQ does not publish a holdings overlap for this pair. Either the funds are not compared on holdings, or one book is incomplete.","full_text_at":"https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-sca"}